Thayer v. Uber, Inc. - Uber Eat's
- Yvonne Rogers
- 4:21-cv-03936
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Thayer v. Uber, Judge Rogers dismissed the case because Zachary Thayer did not file the required amended complaint.
Zachary Thayer’s case was dismissed; the order also directed the clerk to close the file and not accept further filings in the docket.
What happened
In Thayer v. Uber, Inc. — Uber Eat’s, the court had previously dismissed Zachary Thayer’s first amended complaint but allowed him to file another amended complaint.
That amended complaint was due October 15, 2021. The court said Thayer had not filed one by November 5, 2021.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that the earlier dismissal stood and dismissed the case. The clerk was directed to close the file and not accept further filings in the docket.
The detailed version
- Thayer v. Uber, Inc. - Uber Eat's · No. 4:21-cv-03936
- Yvonne Rogers
- Nov. 5, 2021
Background
On September 15, 2021, the court dismissed Zachary Thayer’s first amended complaint and gave him permission to file another amended complaint. The new complaint was due by October 15, 2021.
Court’s Ruling
The court stated that Thayer had not filed an amended complaint by November 5, 2021. It therefore held that the earlier dismissal stood and dismissed the case for failure to file an amended complaint.
The clerk was ordered to close the file and not accept further filings in the docket. The order stated that it terminated the case.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.