Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 136.25.158.172
- Joseph Spero
- 3:21-cv-08613
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Spero granted a one-sided request to subpoena Webpass for the subscriber’s identity and address.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC; Webpass and any other internet service providers identified through the subpoenas; and the subscriber or other individuals whose identifying information is sought.
What happened
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the Northern District of California for permission to subpoena Webpass before the parties held their required early case conference. The subpoena sought the name and address of the person assigned the listed internet address.
The court found good cause and allowed Strike 3 to serve Webpass with the subpoena. The order also allowed subpoenas to other internet providers identified through the process.
The order required notice, gave subscribers and providers 30 days to challenge a subpoena, and required the providers to preserve the information. Judge Joseph C. Spero also limited use of the information to protecting Strike 3’s copyright rights and required identifying information to be filed under seal.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 136.25.158.172 · No. 3:21-cv-08613
- Joseph Spero
- Nov. 17, 2021
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC requested permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties’ conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena sought information identifying the subscriber assigned Internet Protocol address 136.25.158.172.
Court’s reasoning and order
The court found that Strike 3 had shown “good cause” to serve Webpass before the Rule 26(f) conference. It authorized Strike 3 to serve Webpass with a Rule 45 subpoena seeking the defendant’s true name and address. Strike 3 must attach a copy of the order to the subpoena.
The court also authorized Strike 3 to serve a Rule 45 subpoena on any other internet service provider identified in response to a subpoena as providing internet service to the defendant. The order stated that the authorized subpoenas qualify as court orders for purposes of 47 U.S.C. § 551, which concerns disclosure of personally identifying subscriber information.
Each provider must serve the affected subscriber or subscribers with the subpoena and the order within 30 days after service on the provider. Each subscriber and provider then has 30 days after service to challenge the subpoena, including by asking the court to cancel or modify it. If that period expires without a challenge, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information. Providers must preserve the subpoenaed information while production or any timely challenge is pending.
Disposition
Judge Joseph C. Spero granted Strike 3’s application to serve the subpoena. The order limited any information disclosed to use solely for protecting Strike 3’s rights under the Copyright Act. It also required the names and other identifying information of current or proposed defendants and other subscribers identified through the subpoenas to be filed under seal and not otherwise disclosed.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.