Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 15, 2021

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.252.205

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:21-cv-09090
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Intellectual PropertyDiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe: Judge Demarchi allowed early discovery to identify an internet subscriber allegedly linked to copyright infringement.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the identity of the subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.252.205 from Comcast Cable. Comcast must notify the subscriber and may object or seek a protective order; the subscriber’s identity may not be publicly disclosed without consent or court permission.

What happened

In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.252.205, Strike 3 asked to subpoena Comcast Cable before the parties’ required initial conference. Strike 3 sought the subscriber’s true name and address.

The court found good cause for the early subpoena. It said Strike 3 had identified the defendant sufficiently, described efforts to locate the defendant, shown that its lawsuit could survive a request for dismissal, and shown a reasonable likelihood that discovery could identify the defendant for service. The court also noted Strike 3’s compliance with copyright-registration requirements.

The court granted Strike 3’s request. Judge Virginia K. Demarchi authorized a subpoena requiring Comcast to provide the name and address of the subscriber assigned the listed internet address, subject to notice to the subscriber, Comcast’s right to object or seek protection, and limits on using or publicly disclosing the information.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.252.205 · No. 5:21-cv-09090
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Dec. 15, 2021

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve Comcast Cable with a third-party subpoena before the parties held the conference generally required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The subpoena sought the true name and address of the subscriber to whom Comcast assigned Internet Protocol address 24.5.252.205. The defendant was identified in the caption as John Doe subscriber assigned that address.

Court’s Analysis

The court found good cause for allowing the early discovery. It determined that Strike 3 had shown four things: it could identify a real person or entity who could be sued in federal court; it had identified steps already taken to locate the defendant; its action could withstand a motion to dismiss; and there was a reasonable likelihood that discovery would identify the defendant so that service of process would be possible. The court also noted that Strike 3 had satisfied the copyright-registration requirements under 17 U.S.C. § 411(a) for starting a copyright-infringement lawsuit.

The court explained that, at this stage, an Internet Protocol address associated with infringing activity could support a plausible claim for direct or contributory copyright infringement, while also recognizing that the address alone did not identify the defendant. The court therefore allowed limited discovery to determine the defendant’s identity.

Ruling

The court granted Strike 3’s application and authorized it to serve Comcast with a Rule 45 subpoena seeking the subscriber’s true name and address. Strike 3 must attach the order to the subpoena.

Comcast must serve the subscriber with copies of the subpoena and order within 30 days after Comcast is served. Comcast may use any reasonable method, including first-class mail or overnight service to the subscriber’s last known address. Comcast may object to the subpoena and may seek a protective order.

Strike 3 may use information obtained through the subpoena only to protect and enforce the rights asserted in its complaint. If Comcast provides identifying information, Strike 3 may not publicly disclose it without the subscriber’s consent or permission from the court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.