Freedom JN, LLC v. Frontiers Records S.r.l.
- Joseph Spero
- 3:21-cv-10060
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Freedom JN v. Frontiers Records, Judge Spero ordered Freedom JN to explain its members’ citizenship before deciding whether to remand the case.
Freedom JN, LLC must provide information about its members’ citizenship. The defendants are affected because the information may determine whether the case remains in federal court or is returned to state court.
What happened
Freedom JN, LLC v. Frontiers Records S.R.L. was removed from state court based on diversity jurisdiction. The defendants said they believed none of Freedom JN’s members were citizens of Italy, but acknowledged they did not know the members’ identities.
The court ordered Freedom JN to file a declaration about its members’ citizenship by January 19, 2022. The declaration could accompany Freedom JN’s opposition to the defendants’ pending motion to dismiss or could be filed separately. The court explained that if any member was an Italian citizen, returning the case to state court could be appropriate.
Judge Spero did not order remand at this stage. He stated that the order did not prevent Freedom JN from raising other remand arguments in a separate motion.
The detailed version
- Freedom JN, LLC v. Frontiers Records S.r.l. · No. 3:21-cv-10060
- Joseph Spero
- Jan. 6, 2022
Background
The defendants removed the case from state court, asserting federal jurisdiction based on the parties’ citizenship. They relied on their good-faith belief that none of Freedom JN, LLC’s members were citizens of Italy, while acknowledging that they lacked actual knowledge of the members’ identities because that information was not publicly available or reasonably ascertainable.
Jurisdictional issue
For a limited liability company, citizenship depends on the citizenship of its members. The court said that allegations made on information and belief satisfied the defendants’ burden for removal under the reasoning of the cited Ninth Circuit decision. But the court also emphasized that it had an independent duty to determine whether federal jurisdiction existed. If any of Freedom JN’s members were citizens of Italy, the court stated that returning the case to state court would be appropriate.
Order
The court ordered Freedom JN to show cause—meaning to explain—why the case should not be remanded. It required Freedom JN to file a declaration addressing its members’ citizenship no later than January 19, 2022. The declaration could be included with Freedom JN’s opposition to the defendants’ pending motion to dismiss or filed separately.
The court did not decide remand in this order, and it did not rule on the pending motion to dismiss. The order was without prejudice to any other argument for remand that Freedom JN might raise in a separate motion. Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero issued the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.