Diaz De Leon v. Andrew Saul
- Sallie Kim
- 3:20-cv-03552
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
In Diaz De Leon v. Saul, Judge Kim ordered $5,093.76 in Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees after an earlier Social Security remand.
George Diaz De Leon receives the ordered $5,093.76 fee award, subject to any applicable Treasury offset and the payment arrangements described in the order; his counsel may receive direct payment if the stated condition is met.
What happened
In Diaz De Leon v. Andrew Saul, the court had previously reversed the Social Security Commissioner’s decision and sent the case back for a new hearing.
The parties agreed that $5,093.76 was a reasonable award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The agreement did not prevent the plaintiff’s attorney from later seeking fees under another Social Security law provision, subject to required offsets.
Judge Sallie Kim ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff $5,093.76 in attorney fees. The payment was to be made to the plaintiff, with possible direct payment to counsel if the Treasury Department found no qualifying federal debt.
The detailed version
- Diaz De Leon v. Andrew Saul · No. 3:20-cv-03552
- Sallie Kim
- Jan. 19, 2022
Background
The court stated that, on November 9, 2021, it had reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision and remanded the case for a rehearing under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The opinion does not include the reasoning for that earlier decision. The caption identifies Kilolo Kijakazi as the Acting Commissioner and states that she replaced Andrew Saul as the defendant.
Fee Agreement
The parties stipulated that $5,093.76 was a reasonable award of attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The stipulation stated that the award fully released and barred claims relating to Equal Access to Justice Act fees and costs. It also stated that the award was not precedent and was not a concession that the original administrative decision denying benefits lacked substantial justification.
The award did not prevent the plaintiff or his counsel from seeking attorney fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the Equal Access to Justice Act’s offset provisions. The government would first determine whether any Treasury Department offset applied. The fees were to be made payable to the plaintiff, but could be paid directly to counsel under the plaintiff’s assignment if the Treasury Department determined that the plaintiff did not owe a federal debt.
Ruling
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, Judge Sallie Kim ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff $5,093.76 in attorney fees. This opinion concerns the fee award, not the merits of the earlier Social Security decision.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.