Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 20, 2022

Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc.

Judge
Maxine Chesney
Docket
3:20-cv-01520
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Judge Chesney granted in part and denied in part Floyd’s default-judgment motion, awarding $500 and costs but denying treble damages.

Who this affects

Louis Floyd and Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc., along with the other defendants named in the case.

What happened

In Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc., Louis Floyd asked the court to enter default judgment because the defendants did not respond to his motion. The court decided the motion based on the written filings and canceled the scheduled hearing.

The court granted the motion as to $500 in statutory damages and costs under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. It denied the request for treble damages because the complaint did not allege facts showing that any defendant knowingly or deliberately violated that law.

Judge Maxine M. Chesney therefore granted in part and denied in part Floyd’s motion for default judgment. The opinion does not state the amount of costs awarded.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Floyd v. Saratoga Diagnostics, Inc. · No. 3:20-cv-01520
Judge
Maxine Chesney
Date
Jan. 20, 2022

Background

Louis Floyd filed a motion for default judgment on November 30, 2021. The defendants did not respond. Default judgment is a judgment entered when a party against whom relief is sought does not defend the case. The court found that the matter could be decided from the papers supporting the motion and vacated the hearing scheduled for March 10, 2022.

Rulings

The court granted the motion to the extent Floyd sought $500 in statutory damages under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and an award of costs. The opinion does not state the amount of costs awarded.

The court denied the motion to the extent Floyd sought treble damages under that law. The court explained that the complaint did not allege facts supporting a finding that any defendant knowingly or deliberately violated the statute. The court cited a decision reaching the same conclusion where the complaint offered only conclusory statements about a willful or knowing violation.

Disposition

The court granted in part and denied in part Floyd’s motion for default judgment. It also vacated the scheduled hearing.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.