Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 16, 2022

Anderson v. Kijakazi

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:21-cv-08041
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
4
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Anderson v. Kijakazi, Judge Cousins ordered a stipulated $5,990 Equal Access to Justice Act fee award to Ginger Anderson.

Who this affects

Ginger Anderson and her attorney, Francesco Benavides, received an order awarding $5,990 in Equal Access to Justice Act fees and expenses, subject to the parties’ payment terms; the government must process payment and any applicable debt offset.

What happened

Anderson v. Kijakazi concerns a request by Ginger Anderson for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act after this Social Security case. The parties agreed to an award of $5,990 and no costs under a separate costs statute.

The agreement says the fees would be payable to Anderson, although the government could pay her attorney directly if the Treasury Department determined that Anderson did not owe a federal debt. The agreement did not admit that the government was liable and preserved the attorney’s ability to seek certain additional Social Security Act fees.

Judge Nathanael M. Cousins ordered that $5,990 in fees and expenses be awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, subject to the parties’ agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Anderson v. Kijakazi · No. 5:21-cv-08041
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Mar. 16, 2022

Background

Ginger Anderson and the government submitted a joint stipulation asking the court to award attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The agreed amount was $5,990. The parties stipulated that no costs would be awarded under 28 U.S.C. § 1920.

The stipulation states that the amount covers all legal services provided for Anderson in connection with the action. It also states that the agreement is a compromise of Anderson’s fee request and is not an admission that the government was liable under the Equal Access to Justice Act or otherwise.

Payment Terms

The fees were to be made payable to Anderson. After the fee order, the government would determine whether the fees were subject to an offset through the Treasury Department’s debt-offset program. If the government determined that Anderson did not owe a federal debt, it would arrange for payment directly to her attorney, Francesco Benavides, under Anderson’s assignment of the fees.

The stipulation provides that payment of the agreed amount would fully release and bar claims relating to Equal Access to Justice Act fees in this action. It also says the award does not affect Benavides’s right to seek attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the Equal Access to Justice Act’s savings-clause requirements.

Ruling

Judge Nathanael M. Cousins ordered that fees and expenses of $5,990 be awarded under 28 U.S.C. § 2412, subject to the terms of the parties’ stipulation. The opinion addresses the fee award and does not state the outcome of the underlying Social Security dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.