Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 18, 2022

Chavez v. Stellar Management Group VII, LLC

Judge
Joseph Spero
Docket
3:19-cv-01353
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Fee PetitionClass Action
In one sentence

In Chavez v. Stellar Management Group VII, LLC, Magistrate Judge Spero granted attorneys’ fees in part and granted costs and incentive awards.

Who this affects

Class counsel, the settlement class, David Chavez, and Vincent Slaughter were affected. Class counsel received $1,232,500 in fees and $34,384.78 in costs; Chavez received a $12,000 incentive award; Slaughter received a $10,000 incentive award; and the remaining settlement funds were to be distributed under the settlement agreement and separate final-approval order.

What happened

In Chavez v. Stellar Management Group VII, LLC, the plaintiffs asked the court to approve attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive payments from a $4.25 million class-action settlement fund. The court had approved the settlement in a separate order.

The plaintiffs requested about one-third of the fund in attorneys’ fees. The court found that some factors supported a higher fee than the usual 25% benchmark, but the settlement result was not exceptional and class counsel had made errors that delayed approval. The court also found the attorneys’ billing-rate analysis of limited value.

Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granted the attorneys’ fee motion in part, awarding $1,232,500 in fees, and granted the requests for $34,384.78 in costs and incentive awards of $12,000 to David Chavez and $10,000 to Vincent Slaughter.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chavez v. Stellar Management Group VII, LLC · No. 3:19-cv-01353
Judge
Joseph Spero
Date
Mar. 18, 2022

Background

In connection with the plaintiffs’ request for final approval of a class-action settlement, the plaintiffs moved for approval of payments from a $4,250,000 gross common settlement fund. They requested $1,416,666.52 in attorneys’ fees, $34,384.78 in costs, and incentive awards of $12,000 and $10,000 for the two named class representatives, David Chavez and Vincent Slaughter. The court states that it granted final approval of the settlement in a separate order.

Attorneys’ Fees

The requested fee was approximately one-third of the settlement fund. The court explained that the Ninth Circuit generally uses 25% of a common-fund settlement as a benchmark, but permits an adjustment based on circumstances such as the results for class members, the risks counsel assumed, the opportunity cost of taking the case, and comparable market rates. The court also considered the skill required and quality of counsel’s work.

Factors supporting an upward adjustment included defendants’ vigorous litigation at the pleading stage, the plaintiffs’ success on all contested motions, uncertainty about whether the plaintiffs could prevail on some claims, counsel’s contingency-fee risk, and the absence of objections to the fee request. Factors weighing against the full requested amount included the settlement recovery, which was in the low-teen percentage range of total exposure and was not exceptional, and repeated failures by class counsel to follow the court’s guidance about class-action settlements. Those failures required additional briefing and delayed approval.

The court gave little weight to counsel’s lodestar cross-check, which estimated $1,291,655 based on hours multiplied by billing rates before any adjustment. The court stated that some rates were likely reasonable but others exceeded local prevailing rates for attorneys and support staff of comparable skill and experience. The court did not decide whether counsel adequately documented the hours worked.

Ruling

The court found that a fee somewhat above the 25% benchmark was appropriate, but that the requested one-third share was not. It therefore granted the motion to approve attorneys’ fees in part and awarded class counsel $1,232,500, equal to 29% of the common fund.

The court granted the plaintiffs’ requests for costs and incentive awards. It ordered that class counsel recover $1,232,500 in fees and $34,384.78 in costs from the common fund; David Chavez recover $12,000; and Vincent Slaughter recover $10,000. The remaining settlement funds were to be distributed under the settlement agreement and the separate final-approval order. Judge Joseph C. Spero signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.