Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 22, 2022

LINDA M. FREDRICK v. ANDREW SAUL

Judge
Susan Van Keulen
Docket
5:20-cv-04708
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Fee PetitionSocial Security
In one sentence

In Linda M. Fredrick v. Andrew Saul, Judge Van Keulen ordered $4,393.98 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act after remand.

Who this affects

Linda M. Fredrick, her attorney Harvey P. Sackett, and the federal government were affected by the attorney-fee order.

What happened

In Linda M. Fredrick v. Andrew Saul, the court had previously reversed the Social Security decision and sent the case back for a new hearing.

The parties agreed that $4,393.98 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act was reasonable. The payment would go to Linda M. Fredrick, or directly to her lawyer if the Treasury Department found that she did not owe a federal debt.

Judge Susan Van Keulen approved the parties’ agreement and ordered the fee payment. The order did not prevent a later request for fees under another Social Security law, subject to the required offset rules.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
LINDA M. FREDRICK V. ANDREW SAUL · No. 5:20-cv-04708
Judge
Susan Van Keulen
Date
Mar. 22, 2022

Background

The court had issued an earlier order reversing the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision and remanding the case for a rehearing under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Judgment had been entered. The document states that Kilolo Kijakazi became Acting Commissioner on July 9, 2021, and should be substituted for Andrew Saul as the defendant.

Fee Agreement

The parties stipulated that an award of $4,393.98 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), was reasonable. The agreement released and barred further claims by the plaintiff concerning Equal Access to Justice Act fees and costs. It also stated that the award was not a precedent and was not a concession that the original administrative decision was not substantially justified.

The parties agreed that the fees would be payable to the plaintiff. The government would consider paying the fees directly to Harvey P. Sackett under the plaintiff’s assignment if the Treasury Department determined that the plaintiff did not owe a federal debt. The agreement preserved the right of the plaintiff’s counsel to seek fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the applicable offset and savings provisions.

Ruling

Judge Susan Van Keulen ordered the stipulated fee award. The order approved payment of $4,393.98 in attorney fees to the plaintiff under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.