Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 28, 2022

Pelton v. Amador

Judge
Claire
Docket
5:22-cv-02027
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Pelton v. Amador, Judge Claire transferred the civil-rights case to the Northern District of California because venue was proper there.

Who this affects

The case is moved from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California. Pelton’s filing-fee application and other motions remain unaddressed by this order, and the underlying claims were not decided.

What happened

Pelton v. Amador is a civil-rights case brought by Sean Michael Pelton, a county jail inmate representing himself, against Richard Amador and others. Pelton filed the case in the Eastern District of California and also applied to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court said the defendants were located in San Francisco County and that the claim arose there. Because San Francisco County is in the Northern District of California, the court concluded that the case should have been filed there.

Judge Allison Claire ordered the case transferred to the Northern District of California. The court did not decide Pelton’s application to proceed without paying the filing fee, his motion to change venue, or his motion to add material to the complaint.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Pelton v. Amador · No. 5:22-cv-02027
Judge
Claire
Date
Mar. 28, 2022

Background

Sean Michael Pelton, a county jail inmate proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He also applied to proceed without paying the filing fee and filed motions to change venue and add an addendum to the complaint.

Venue analysis

The court applied the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute identifies districts where a civil action may be filed, including a district where a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. The court stated that the defendant or defendants were located in San Francisco County and that the claim arose there. Because San Francisco County is in the Northern District of California, the court concluded that the case had been filed in the wrong district.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district when doing so serves the interests of justice. Judge Allison Claire ordered that the matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The court expressly did not address the application to proceed without paying the filing fee, the motion to change venue, or the motion to file an addendum. The order addressed venue only and did not decide the underlying civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.