Tolbert v. Colley
- Jacquelyn Corley
- 3:22-cv-02026
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 5
In Tolbert v. Colley, Judge Corley dismissed claims against three defendants, allowed claims against two officers, and permitted amendment.
Joel Tolbert's claims against Officers James Colley and James Perkinson were allowed to proceed, while his claims against Chief Allen Cantando, the Antioch Police Department, and Contra Costa County Detention Health Services were dismissed with permission to amend.
What happened
In Tolbert v. Colley, Joel Tolbert, a California prisoner without a lawyer, sued the Antioch Police Department, its chief, two officers, and Contra Costa County Detention Health Services under a federal civil-rights law.
Tolbert alleged that Officers James Colley and James Perkinson used excessive force while arresting him. The court found those allegations sufficient to proceed against the officers, but found no sufficient allegations against the police chief, police department, or detention health-services defendant.
Judge Corley dismissed the claims against those three defendants for failure to state a claim and gave Tolbert permission to file an amended complaint. If he does not amend on time, the case will proceed only against Colley and Perkinson, and the other claims will then be dismissed with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Tolbert v. Colley · No. 3:22-cv-02026
- Jacquelyn Corley
- Apr. 26, 2022
Background
Joel Tolbert, a California prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Section 1983 allows a person to seek relief for a violation of federal rights by someone acting under state law. The defendants were the Antioch Police Department, APD Chief Allen Cantando, APD Officers James Colley and James Perkinson, and Contra Costa County Detention Health Services.
Tolbert alleged that Colley and Perkinson shot, beat, cut, suffocated, and threatened to sexually assault him while arresting him at his mother's house, even though he was not resisting. The court reviewed the complaint under the required preliminary screening of prisoner cases.
Court's Analysis
The court concluded that, when read liberally, Tolbert's allegations stated a viable claim under Section 1983 against Colley and Perkinson for violating the Fourth Amendment.
The court dismissed the complaint as to Cantando because Tolbert made no allegations against him. A supervisor is not automatically liable under Section 1983 merely because officers allegedly violated someone's rights. The court allowed Tolbert to amend by alleging actions or omissions by Cantando that caused the alleged violation.
The court also dismissed the claims against the Antioch Police Department and Contra Costa County Detention Health Services because Tolbert made no allegations against either entity. A local-government entity generally can be liable for a constitutional violation only when an official policy or custom caused it. The court stated that Tolbert must allege such a policy or custom for the police department if it is part of the City of Antioch government. For the detention health-services defendant, the court stated that Tolbert must allege an action or omission that caused a rights violation and, if the entity is part of Contra Costa County government, a policy or custom that caused the violation. The court said it was unclear whether that defendant was a local government agency or a private entity providing jail health services.
Ruling
The court ordered that the complaint be dismissed as to Allen Cantando, the Antioch Police Department, and Contra Costa County Detention Health Services for failure to state a claim. It concluded that the complaint stated claims against James Colley and James Perkinson. Judge Corley granted Tolbert leave to file an amended complaint addressing the identified deficiencies by May 16, 2022.
The court warned that an amended complaint replaces the original complaint and must include all claims Tolbert wishes to pursue, including the claims against Colley and Perkinson. If Tolbert failed to amend within the required time and in the required form, the case would proceed only against Colley and Perkinson, and the claims against the other defendants would be dismissed with prejudice.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.