Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 2, 2022

K.W. v. Epic Games, Inc.

Judge
Charles Breyer
Docket
3:21-cv-00976
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass ActionMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In K.W. v. Epic Games, Judge Breyer granted Epic’s unopposed motion to dismiss because a North Carolina settlement released Plaintiffs’ claims.

Who this affects

The dismissal affected K.W. and the other Plaintiffs, as well as Epic Games, Inc.; the case was dismissed with prejudice based on the release in the North Carolina settlement.

What happened

In K.W. v. Epic Games, Inc., Plaintiffs had participated in a nationwide class settlement with Epic Games in North Carolina state court. The settlement became final after all appeals were withdrawn.

The parties agreed that North Carolina law made the settlement release the claims Plaintiffs brought in this case. The court therefore granted Epic’s unopposed motion to dismiss and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Judge Charles R. Breyer issued the order on May 2, 2022.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
K.W. v. Epic Games, Inc. · No. 3:21-cv-00976
Judge
Charles Breyer
Date
May 2, 2022

Background

Plaintiffs participated in a nationwide class settlement with Epic Games in North Carolina state court. The settlement was final, and all appeals had been withdrawn. Epic moved to dismiss this separate action, and the motion was unopposed.

Reasoning

The court stated that whether the claims were barred by the prior state-court judgment depended on the claim-preclusion rules of the relevant state. The parties agreed that, under North Carolina law, the settlement agreement released the claims Plaintiffs raised in this case.

Ruling

The court granted Epic Games, Inc.’s unopposed motion to dismiss and dismissed the case with prejudice. Judge Charles R. Breyer signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.