Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2022

Johnson v. Pennylane Frozen Yogurt, LLC

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:22-cv-00609
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
11
ADA / DisabilityCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Johnson v. Pennylane, Judge Freeman granted in part default judgment, awarding damages, fees, costs, and an accessibility injunction.

Who this affects

Scott Johnson received statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, costs, and an injunction requiring Pennylane Frozen Yogurt, LLC to bring its dining surfaces into compliance with the 2010 accessibility standards. Pennylane must comply with the injunction and the monetary award.

What happened

In Johnson v. Pennylane Frozen Yogurt, LLC, Scott Johnson alleged that the restaurant’s dining surfaces were not accessible to wheelchair users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Act. Pennylane did not appear or respond, and the clerk entered default against it.

The court granted in part Johnson’s request for default judgment. It awarded him $4,000 in statutory damages, $2,814.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs, and an injunction requiring Pennylane to bring its dining surfaces into compliance with the 2010 accessibility standards.

Judge Beth Labson Freeman found that Pennylane was properly served, that the court had jurisdiction, and that Johnson adequately alleged violations of both laws. The court reduced the requested attorneys’ fees based on the hourly rates and hours it found reasonable.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Johnson v. Pennylane Frozen Yogurt, LLC · No. 5:22-cv-00609
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
May 31, 2022

Background

Scott Johnson alleged that he is a C-5 quadriplegic who uses a wheelchair and has significant manual dexterity impairments. He alleged that he visited Pennylane Frozen Yogurt & Candy in August and November 2021 and encountered indoor and outdoor dining surfaces that lacked sufficient knee or toe clearance for wheelchair users. Johnson alleged that he intended to return but was deterred by the access barriers.

Johnson asserted claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits disability discrimination by places of public accommodation, and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. He sought an injunction, statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Pennylane failed to appear or respond. At Johnson’s request, the clerk entered default.

Default judgment analysis

A default judgment is a judgment entered when a defendant fails to plead or otherwise defend. Before entering one, the court reviewed its subject-matter jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, service of process, and the factors identified in Eitel v. McCool.

The court found that it had federal-question jurisdiction over the ADA claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. It also found that Pennylane was subject to personal jurisdiction and had been properly served. The court concluded that the factors supported entering default judgment, including because Johnson would otherwise have no means of obtaining relief and Pennylane’s failure to participate made a decision through a contested trial impossible.

The court also found that Johnson adequately alleged an ADA claim. It found that he alleged a qualifying disability, that Pennylane operated a restaurant covered by the ADA, and that he personally encountered wheelchair-accessibility barriers. Johnson also alleged that removing the barriers was readily achievable, meaning it could be done without much difficulty or expense. Because the court found that the ADA allegations were sufficient, it concluded that Johnson had also sufficiently alleged an Unruh Act claim.

Relief awarded

The court granted in part Johnson’s motion for default judgment. It granted injunctive relief requiring Pennylane to bring its dining surfaces into compliance with the 2010 ADA Accessibility Guidelines.

The court awarded $4,000 in statutory damages under the Unruh Act. Johnson had sought that amount despite alleging multiple visits to the restaurant.

Johnson requested $3,265 in attorneys’ fees. The court found that some requested hourly rates exceeded rates generally approved in similar disability cases in the Northern District of California. It awarded rates of $475 for Mark Potter, $350 each for Amanda Seabock and Candice Clipner, and $100 for Marcus Handy and other legal assistants and staff. The court also reduced the compensable hours because it found some work excessive or duplicative. It awarded $1,912.50 in attorneys’ fees and $902 in costs, for a total of $2,814.50 in fees and costs.

Order

The court ordered that Johnson’s motion for default judgment was granted in part; that he receive $4,000 in statutory damages and $2,814.50 in attorneys’ fees and costs; and that Pennylane comply with the injunction concerning its dining surfaces. Johnson was also ordered to promptly serve Pennylane with the order and file proof of service.

The authoritative version

Read the full 11-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.