Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled June 1, 2022

PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc..

Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Docket
4:20-cv-05381
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContractSummary Judgment
In one sentence

In JH Kelly v. AECOM, Judge Gilliam clarified that lien waivers did not resolve JH Kelly’s quantum meruit/abandonment claim.

Who this affects

JH Kelly, LLC and AECOM Technical Services, Inc.; the ruling preserved JH Kelly’s quantum meruit/abandonment claim from the scope of the earlier partial summary-judgment ruling based on the lien waivers.

What happened

JH Kelly, LLC sued AECOM Technical Services, Inc. In an earlier order, the court ruled that JH Kelly waived claims for labor and materials furnished through September 12, 2018, based on lien-waiver language.

JH Kelly asked the court to clarify whether that ruling also applied to its quantum meruit/abandonment claim. The claim alleges that the subcontract was no longer in effect. The court said its earlier order had not addressed whether the lien waivers also released that claim.

The court confirmed that its earlier partial summary-judgment ruling did not apply to JH Kelly’s quantum meruit/abandonment claim. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. also stated that he would not consider further motions seeking reconsideration or clarification of this issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
PG&E Corporation v. AECOM Technical Services, Inc.. · No. 4:20-cv-05381
Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Date
June 1, 2022

Background

The court had previously granted AECOM Technical Services, Inc.’s motion for partial summary judgment. It held that JH Kelly, LLC waived claims for labor and materials furnished through September 12, 2018, by signing a document stating that it released and relinquished claims and lien rights for that work.

As part of its request for reconsideration, JH Kelly asked whether the earlier ruling also applied to its quantum meruit/abandonment claim. The opinion describes that claim as alleging that the subcontract was no longer in effect. JH Kelly argued that the lien waivers were part of the subcontract, or were submitted as a subcontract requirement, and therefore questioned whether the alleged abandonment affected the waivers.

Ruling

The court stated that its earlier order had not addressed whether the lien waivers released JH Kelly’s quantum meruit/abandonment claim. It therefore confirmed that the earlier grant of partial summary judgment based on the lien waivers did not apply to that claim.

The court directed the parties to submit supplemental briefs on the issue, but found that the briefs did not identify controlling authority and instead raised additional substantive arguments. Because the dispositive-motion deadline and pretrial conference had already passed, the court stated that it would not entertain any further motion for reconsideration, clarification, or an equivalent request concerning this issue. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ordered that result on June 1, 2022.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.