Lin v. Solta Medical, Inc.
- Phyllis Hamilton
- 4:21-cv-05062
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 11
In Lin v. Solta Medical, Judge Hamilton adopted a case-management plan setting discovery, mediation, motion, pretrial, and trial deadlines.
Hsin Lin and Solta Medical, Inc., whose case is governed by the deadlines and procedures in the order.
What happened
In Lin v. Solta Medical, Inc., the court adopted the parties’ case-management statement with changes. The order concerns Hsin Lin’s case against Solta Medical, Inc., but it does not describe the underlying claims or defenses.
The order set a March 11, 2024 jury trial lasting no more than 10 days, a February 15, 2024 pretrial conference, and a November 2, 2023 deadline for dispositive motions. It also set discovery and expert-disclosure deadlines, referred the parties to private mediation, and established requirements for trial filings, exhibits, witnesses, jury instructions, and motions.
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton issued the case-management and pretrial order on July 15, 2022. The order manages the case and sets procedures; it does not decide the parties’ underlying legal claims.
The detailed version
- Lin v. Solta Medical, Inc. · No. 4:21-cv-05062
- Phyllis Hamilton
- July 15, 2022
Nature of the Order
This is a case-management and pretrial order. The court adopted the parties’ case-management statement except where the order modified it. The opinion does not state the substance of Hsin Lin’s claims or Solta Medical, Inc.’s defenses, and it does not decide the merits of those claims.
Schedule
The order set a jury trial for March 11, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., with a trial length of no more than 10 days. It set the final pretrial conference for February 15, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., and required dispositive motions—motions that could resolve claims or the case—to be heard by November 2, 2023. Each party may file only one summary-judgment motion without the court’s permission.
The order set August 1, 2023, as the cutoff for non-expert discovery; April 1, 2023, and June 1, 2023, as the plaintiff’s and defendant’s expert-disclosure deadlines; and July 1, 2023, as the expert-discovery cutoff. It required discovery disputes to be presented through a joint letter brief and referred discovery motions to a magistrate judge. The parties were also referred to private mediation, to be completed by August 1, 2023.
The parties could seek to amend their pleadings no later than 90 days before the fact-discovery cutoff, with enough time remaining to conduct discovery concerning added claims or parties. Any Doe defendants had to be identified by that deadline or they would be dismissed.
Pretrial and Trial Requirements
The order required the parties to prepare a joint pretrial statement describing the claims and defenses remaining for trial, requested damages, undisputed and disputed facts, proposed stipulations, disputed legal issues, possible separate trials, and settlement negotiations. It also required trial briefs, motions in limine, deposition-excerpt designations, witness lists, exhibit lists, proposed jury materials, and a proposed verdict form. Parties generally could not use witnesses or exhibits in their cases-in-chief unless they disclosed them in the required pretrial filings, absent court permission and good cause.
The order established procedures for jury selection, proposed jury instructions, trial hours, evidence objections, confidential materials, and amendment of the schedule. Changes to the order required a written court order based on good cause, and the parties could not change the pretrial schedule merely by stipulation.
Disposition and Classification
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton entered the case-management and pretrial order. Because the order handles scheduling, discovery, mediation, and trial procedures rather than deciding the underlying legal dispute, it is classified as a procedural order.
Read the full 11-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.