Storey v. Marin County Sheriff Department
- Yvonne Rogers
- 4:22-cv-03939
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Storey v. Marin County Sheriff Department, Judge Tse screened Storey’s complaint, found her requested orders unavailable, and allowed amendment.
Sherri Storey, the Marin County Sheriff Department, the United States Department of Justice, and Steve A. Frankel.
What happened
In Storey v. Marin County Sheriff Department, Sherri Storey asked the court to order the Sheriff Department to report Steve A. Frankel to the Federal Bureau of Investigation and to require the Justice Department to investigate and prosecute him.
The court said it could not issue those orders. It explained that federal courts cannot use this type of order to direct state officials, and cannot force federal prosecutors to investigate or prosecute a particular person. The court did not dismiss the case at this stage.
The court allowed Storey to file an amended complaint by July 29, 2022, and said a judge would be asked to dismiss the case if she did not amend or still failed to state a viable claim. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse also vacated the deadlines and ordered that no summons issue and the complaint not be served.
The detailed version
- Storey v. Marin County Sheriff Department · No. 4:22-cv-03939
- Yvonne Rogers
- July 15, 2022
Background
Sherri Storey applied to proceed without paying the filing fee, and the court granted that application. The court then screened her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Storey sought a writ of mandamus, which is a court order directing an official to perform a specific duty.
Storey wanted an order requiring the Marin County Sheriff Department to report to the Federal Bureau of Investigation that Steve A. Frankel was possibly the Zodiac serial killer and had mentally and physically harmed her. She also sought an order requiring the United States Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute Frankel.
Court’s analysis
The court held that the requested relief was unavailable as a matter of law. First, it stated that a federal district court lacks authority to issue mandamus relief against state officers. For that reason, it could not order Marin County to contact the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Second, the court stated that a district court cannot compel federal prosecutors to investigate or prosecute a particular person. Prosecutorial decisions are discretionary, and mandamus can compel a federal official only when the official has a nondiscretionary, ministerial duty. The court concluded that Storey’s requested investigation and prosecution did not meet that standard.
Order and effect
The court did not dismiss the case in this order. Instead, it allowed Storey to file an amended complaint by July 29, 2022. The order stated that if she did not amend, or if the amended complaint did not state a viable claim for relief, the undersigned would recommend that a district judge dismiss the case. The court vacated all deadlines and directed the Clerk not to issue a summons or serve the complaint.
The opinion is signed by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.