American Immigration Council v. United States Citizenship and Immigration…
American Immigration Council v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
- Donna Ryu
- 4:20-cv-03266
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 6
In American Immigration Council v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Judge Ryu vacated and rescheduled the case-management conference for October 5, 2022.
The plaintiffs and federal defendant agencies in this Freedom of Information Act case were affected by the rescheduling order, which moved their Further Case Management Conference to October 5, 2022 and required an updated joint statement.
What happened
American Immigration Council, the American Immigration Lawyers Association, and Human Rights Watch sued federal immigration agencies under the Freedom of Information Act over four information requests concerning the Migrant Protection Protocols.
The parties jointly asked to postpone an August 3, 2022, case-management conference because they believed the case could be resolved after a Supreme Court decision concerning that program, but needed more time to reach an agreement.
Judge Ryu granted the request as modified: she vacated the August 3 conference, continued it to October 5, 2022, by videoconference, and required an updated joint case-management statement by September 28, 2022.
The detailed version
- American Immigration Council v. United States Citizenship and Immigration… · No. 4:20-cv-03266
- Donna Ryu
- July 27, 2022
Background
American Immigration Council, American Immigration Lawyers Association, and Human Rights Watch brought this Freedom of Information Act case against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Customs and Border Protection, and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The case concerns four information requests about the Migrant Protection Protocols.
The parties described developments concerning that program, including the Supreme Court's June 30, 2022, decision reversing the Fifth Circuit's decision and holding that the administration's rescission of the program was a valid final agency action. The parties stated that, in light of that decision, they understood the program would not be implemented going forward and believed the case could be resolved, but needed additional time to reach an agreement.
Request and Order
The parties jointly requested that the August 3, 2022, Further Case Management Conference be vacated and continued to October 3, 2022, or as soon thereafter as the court was available. They stated that judicial intervention was not then needed and that their earlier joint case-management statement remained accurate.
The court ordered the conference vacated and continued it, as modified, to October 5, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in Oakland by videoconference only. The court also ordered the parties to file an updated joint case-management conference statement by September 28, 2022.
Result
This was a scheduling order. It did not decide the merits of the Freedom of Information Act claims or otherwise resolve the parties' dispute. Judge Ryu ordered the conference continued as modified.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.