Donovan v. Coinbase Global, Inc.
- Haywood Gilliam
- 3:22-cv-02826
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 6
In Donovan v. Coinbase, Judge Gilliam appointed three lead plaintiffs, approved their law firm as lead counsel, and set deadlines for anticipated motions.
Kenneth Donovan, Hussien Kassfy, and John Brambl were appointed lead plaintiffs for the proposed class, and Erickson Kramer Osborne LLP was approved as lead counsel. The order also set deadlines and a hearing schedule affecting the plaintiffs and defendants GMO-Z.COM Trust Company, Inc., Coinbase Global, Inc., and Coinbase Inc.
What happened
In Donovan v. Coinbase Global, Inc., Kenneth Donovan and Hussien Kassfy filed the first complaint and published notice inviting proposed class members to seek appointment as lead plaintiff. John Brambl later joined the group seeking appointment.
The court found that Donovan, Kassfy, and Brambl had the largest financial interest, with an approximate combined loss of $522,404. It also found that their claims were typical of the proposed class and that they could fairly and adequately represent it. No class member rebutted that finding, so the court appointed all three as lead plaintiffs and approved Erickson Kramer Osborne LLP as lead counsel.
Judge Gilliam also granted the parties’ agreement to continue the deadline for a responsive pleading, required plaintiffs to identify an operative complaint by August 25, 2022, set a schedule for anticipated arbitration and dismissal motions, and vacated the August 23, 2022 case-management conference.
The detailed version
- Donovan v. Coinbase Global, Inc. · No. 3:22-cv-02826
- Haywood Gilliam
- Aug. 9, 2022
Background
Kenneth Donovan, Hussien Kassfy, and John Brambl sought appointment as lead plaintiffs under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, a federal law that governs the selection of representatives and counsel in many securities class actions. The defendants are GMO-Z.COM Trust Company, Inc., Coinbase Global, Inc., and Coinbase Inc. The proposed class’s claims concern purchases or acquisitions of GYEN when it was not pegged one-to-one to the Japanese yen. The plaintiffs alleged losses caused by misrepresentations about GYEN’s stability, negligence in failing to keep GYEN pegged, and the unregistered sale of securities.
Donovan and Kassfy filed the first complaint on May 13, 2022, and published the required notice on May 16, 2022. The notice informed potential class members about the action and the deadline to seek appointment as lead plaintiff.
Lead-plaintiff analysis
The court described the three-step process under the Act. First, notice must be provided so potential class members can seek appointment. Second, the court identifies the person or group with the largest financial interest who also makes an initial showing of adequacy and typicality under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Third, other class members may try to rebut the resulting presumption.
The court found that Donovan, Kassfy, and Brambl represented the largest financial interest in the litigation, based on an approximate total loss of $522,404. It also found that they made the required initial showing of typicality and adequacy. Their claims arose from the same alleged conduct and legal theories as the proposed class’s claims. The court further found that they had no conflicts with other class members, were not subject to unique defenses, had retained experienced counsel, and had taken steps to make decisions cohesively and prosecute the case jointly.
No member of the proposed class submitted sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption that the plaintiffs were the most adequate representatives.
Rulings and case schedule
The court appointed Kenneth Donovan, Hussien Kassfy, and John Brambl as lead plaintiffs. It approved Erickson Kramer Osborne LLP as lead counsel, finding the firm to be a reasonable choice with relevant experience and no conflict with the class.
The court also granted the parties’ stipulation continuing the date for a responsive pleading. It required plaintiffs to identify an operative complaint by August 25, 2022, and set briefing and a January 5, 2023 hearing for defendants’ anticipated motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss. The court vacated the August 23, 2022 case-management conference and stated that it would reset that conference as necessary after the anticipated motions were fully briefed. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. signed the order.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.