Villegas v. Hesperian Boulevard, LLC
- Vince Chhabria
- 3:22-cv-00357
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Villegas v. Hesperian Boulevard, LLC, Judge Chhabria declined supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and granted dismissal without prejudice of the ADA claim.
Luis Villegas’s ADA claim was dismissed without prejudice, and the court declined supplemental jurisdiction over his Unruh Act claim. The order allowed the clerk to close the case.
What happened
In Villegas v. Hesperian Boulevard, LLC, the federal court considered claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act.
The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim, finding that the case was at an early stage and that retaining the claim would not promote efficiency, convenience, fairness, or respect for state courts. The court granted the request to dismiss the ADA claim without prejudice and allowed the clerk to close the case.
Judge Vince Chhabria issued the order on August 24, 2022.
The detailed version
- Villegas v. Hesperian Boulevard, LLC · No. 3:22-cv-00357
- Vince Chhabria
- Aug. 24, 2022
Background
Luis Villegas brought claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act against Hesperian Boulevard, LLC, and other defendants. The order refers to the requesting party as “the plaintiffs,” although the caption identifies Luis Villegas as the plaintiff.
Court’s Analysis
The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. Supplemental jurisdiction is a federal court’s authority to hear certain state-law claims connected to a federal claim. The court relied on 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4) and stated that the case was in its early stages, so judicial economy, convenience, fairness to the litigants, and comity did not favor keeping the state-law claim in federal court. The court also stated that the facts presented the type of exceptional circumstances supporting a decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, describing the case as involving a frequent filer of ADA and Unruh Act claims seeking federal jurisdiction to avoid California procedural barriers.
Disposition
The court granted the request to dismiss the ADA claim without prejudice. It declined supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim. The clerk was permitted to close the case, and the order was signed by Judge Vince Chhabria.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.