Johnson v. GTD Ventures, LLC
- Thomas Hixson
- 3:21-cv-07525
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Johnson v. GTD Ventures, Judge Hixson ordered Visible Vibrations to explain why default should not be entered after its lawyer withdrew.
Visible Vibrations, which was ordered to respond; the opinion does not state what happened to the other parties.
What happened
Johnson v. GTD Ventures, LLC involves an order concerning Defendant Visible Vibrations. The court previously allowed Visible’s lawyer, David Sidran, to withdraw and directed the corporation to obtain another licensed lawyer.
Because Visible did not appear through substitute counsel, the court ordered it to explain why default should not be entered. Visible was directed to file a declaration by September 29, 2022.
Judge Thomas S. Hixson issued the order on September 16, 2022. The opinion text ends before stating what the court would do if Visible filed a response.
The detailed version
- Johnson v. GTD Ventures, LLC · No. 3:21-cv-07525
- Thomas Hixson
- Sept. 16, 2022
Background
On June 29, 2022, the court granted David Sidran’s motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Visible Vibrations. The court stated that Visible is a corporation and therefore can appear in federal court only through licensed counsel. It directed Visible to file a substitution of counsel by July 29, 2022, and warned that failing to retain substitute counsel could lead to default judgment.
Order
The court stated that Visible had made no subsequent appearance in the case. It ordered Visible to show cause—meaning to explain—why default should not be entered against it. The court required Visible to file a declaration responding to that order by September 29, 2022.
The provided opinion text is incomplete after stating that, if Visible filed a response, the court would take further action. It does not state that default was entered, and it does not provide the court’s later action on any response.
Disposition and effect
This is an order to show cause, not a final ruling entering default. It requires Visible Vibrations to respond. The opinion does not state the effect on Plaintiff Scott Johnson or the other defendants. Judge Thomas S. Hixson signed the order as a United States Magistrate Judge.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.