Pinzon v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office
- Vince Chhabria
- 3:22-cv-03744
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Pinzon v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office, Judge Chhabria granted fee-waiver status but dismissed the complaint without leave to amend.
The plaintiffs, including Abraham G. Pinzon, and the defendants named in the case were affected by the dismissal; Pinzon's request to proceed without paying the filing fee was granted.
What happened
In Pinzon v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office, Abraham G. Pinzon and other plaintiffs brought a complaint against the Mendocino County Sheriff's Office and other defendants. The opinion says Pinzon could not sue on behalf of Lodarski and that the complaint failed to state a claim for relief.
The court granted Pinzon's request to proceed without paying the filing fee. It then dismissed the complaint under the federal statute governing screening of such cases, relying on problems identified in an earlier related proceeding.
Judge Vince Chhabria ordered the case dismissed without leave to amend. The opinion does not identify the specific underlying legal claim or explain additional facts about the parties.
The detailed version
- Pinzon v. Mendocino County Sheriff's Office · No. 3:22-cv-03744
- Vince Chhabria
- Sept. 26, 2022
Background
Abraham G. Pinzon and other plaintiffs sued the Mendocino County Sheriff's Office and other defendants. The opinion states that Pinzon could not sue on behalf of Lodarski. It also states that the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted. The opinion does not identify the complaint's specific legal cause of action.
Court's Analysis
The court granted Pinzon's request to proceed without paying the filing fee. It then dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the statute the court applied to screen the case. The court said Pinzon had not addressed problems identified by Judge Iman in a prior related proceeding, including the inability to sue on behalf of Lodarski and the failure to state a claim.
Disposition
Judge Vince Chhabria dismissed the case without leave to amend. The order did not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice. The opinion does not provide further information about the claims or the defendants' responses.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.