Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 29, 2022

Phillips v. Jusino

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:22-cv-05220
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Phillips v. Jusino, Judge Demarchi granted Phillips’s motion to transfer her prisoner petition to Illinois because her current custodian was there.

Who this affects

Lois Latrilla Phillips’s § 2241 petition was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Southern District of Illinois; the order did not decide the earned-time-credit claim.

What happened

In Phillips v. Jusino, Lois Latrilla Phillips, a federal prisoner representing herself, claimed she was entitled to earned-time credits under the First Step Act.

Phillips asked to move the case to the federal district covering her current place of confinement. She had been confined in Dublin when she filed the case, but her current custodian was at a federal prison camp in Illinois.

Judge Demarchi granted Phillips’s motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of Illinois. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file there.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Phillips v. Jusino · No. 5:22-cv-05220
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Nov. 29, 2022

Background

Lois Latrilla Phillips, a federal prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 claiming that she was entitled to earned-time credits under the First Step Act. When she filed the case, her custodian was in Dublin, within the Northern District of California.

Phillips later filed a notice of change of address and moved to transfer the case to the federal district covering her current confinement. Her current custodian was at Federal Prison Camp Greenville in Bond County, Illinois, within the Southern District of Illinois.

Court’s reasoning

The court explained that a court handling a petition under § 2241 generally must have jurisdiction over the prisoner’s custodian. It also stated that the district where a prisoner is confined is normally the most convenient forum because the prisoner’s records follow her to that location and transfer promotes consistent handling of these petitions.

The court found that transferring the case to the district of confinement was appropriate on convenience grounds and would not create undue delay. It relied on 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer to a more convenient federal district.

Disposition

The court GRANTED Phillips’s motion to transfer. The clerk was ordered to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The order did not decide whether Phillips was entitled to earned-time credits.

Judge-name note

The opinion is signed by Nia K. Demarchi, although the supplied case metadata lists Virginia Demarchi.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.