Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 13, 2023

Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.188.225.200

Judge
Joseph Spero
Docket
3:23-cv-00238
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
DiscoveryCivil ProcedureIntellectual Property
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Spero authorized subpoenas to identify the internet subscriber linked to the listed IP address.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the subscriber’s identifying information from Comcast and any other identified internet service provider. The subscriber and any provider may challenge the subpoena within the specified 30-day period, and providers must preserve the requested information while a timely challenge is pending.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the court for permission to subpoena Comcast before the parties held their required early case-management meeting. The company sought the subscriber’s true name and address for the person assigned IP address 67.188.225.200.

The court found good cause and allowed Strike 3 Holdings to serve Comcast with the subpoena. It also allowed subpoenas to other internet providers identified through that process.

The providers must notify affected subscribers, who have 30 days to challenge a subpoena; Judge Spero’s order also restricted use of disclosed information to protecting copyright rights.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.188.225.200 · No. 3:23-cv-00238
Judge
Joseph Spero
Date
Feb. 13, 2023

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC applied without advance notice to the opposing party for permission to serve a subpoena before the parties’ required Rule 26(f) conference, an early meeting about managing a federal case. The requested subpoena sought information identifying the subscriber to whom Comcast Cable assigned IP address 67.188.225.200.

Court’s ruling

The court found that Strike 3 Holdings had shown “good cause” and granted the application. The order authorized Strike 3 Holdings to serve Comcast with a subpoena requiring Comcast to provide the defendant’s true name and address. It also authorized subpoenas to any other internet service provider identified in response as providing internet service to the defendant.

The order treated the authorized subpoenas as court orders permitting disclosure under 47 U.S.C. § 551. Each internet service provider must give each affected subscriber a copy of the subpoena and the order within 30 days after receiving the subpoena. Each subscriber and provider then has 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to cancel or change it. If no timely challenge is filed, the provider has 10 days to produce the requested information. Providers must preserve the subpoenaed information while awaiting production or resolution of a timely challenge.

Limits on disclosure

Information disclosed in response to a subpoena may be used only to protect Strike 3 Holdings’ rights under the Copyright Act. Any information about a current or proposed defendant must be filed under seal and not otherwise disclosed. The order did not decide whether the defendant infringed copyright or resolve the underlying case. Judge Joseph C. Spero signed the order on February 13, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.