Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 15, 2023

Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Docket
4:19-cv-05401-HSG
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Judge Gilliam terminated Fuqua’s IFP motion and ordered an amended complaint by March 14, 2023.

Who this affects

Tammi Fuqua must file a standalone amended complaint by March 14, 2023, if she intends to pursue the action; United Parcel Service, Inc. remains the named defendant.

What happened

In Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Tammi Fuqua asked to proceed without paying filing fees. The court said Judge Corley had already granted her original request for that status.

The court terminated Fuqua’s new motion and directed her to file a standalone amended complaint addressing defects identified in the earlier orders. The amended complaint had to be filed by March 14, 2023, and failing to do so could result in dismissal without further notice.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. also explained that the amended complaint must clearly identify each claim, defendant, and relevant conduct, and must include all claims and defendants because it would replace the earlier complaint.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Fuqua v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · No. 4:19-cv-05401-HSG
Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Date
Feb. 15, 2023

Background

Tammi Fuqua filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning a request to proceed without paying the usual filing fees. The court noted that Judge Corley had already granted Fuqua’s original request for that status.

Court’s action

The court TERMINATED Fuqua’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis because her original request had already been granted. The court did not decide the underlying claims against United Parcel Service, Inc.

The court DIRECTED Fuqua to file a standalone amended complaint addressing the defects identified in Judge Corley’s October 8, 2019 order and summarized in Judge Corley’s November 25, 2019 report and recommendation. The deadline was March 14, 2023. The court stated that failing to file an amended complaint consistent with the order by that deadline may result in dismissal of the action without further notice.

Instructions for the amended complaint

The court explained that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires a short and plain statement of the legal claims. For each claim, Fuqua was instructed to identify the defendant being sued and specify that defendant’s relevant actions or failures to act. The court stated that it would not search through exhibits to determine the legal claims or the people or entities Fuqua sought to sue.

The amended complaint would completely replace the earlier complaint. Fuqua therefore had to include every claim and defendant she wished to pursue and could not incorporate material from earlier pleadings by reference. The court also reiterated that she did not need to file another request to proceed without paying filing fees.

Disposition

The court terminated the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and directed Fuqua to file an amended complaint by March 14, 2023. Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.