Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2023

Jweinat v. loanDepot.com, LLC

Judge
Vince Chhabria
Docket
3:22-cv-05387
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to DismissConsumer Credit
In one sentence

In Jweinat v. loanDepot.com, Judge Chhabria granted dismissal because plaintiffs lacked a concrete injury, leaving dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; the opinion does not state any further effect on the parties.

What happened

In Jweinat v. loanDepot.com, LLC, the plaintiffs brought claims based on an alleged procedural violation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and a related California Unfair Competition Law claim.

The plaintiffs conceded that they had not identified a concrete injury beyond the alleged procedural violation. The court therefore ruled that they lacked standing to bring either claim and granted the motion to dismiss.

Because the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, it dismissed the case without prejudice. Judge Vince Chhabria issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jweinat v. loanDepot.com, LLC · No. 3:22-cv-05387
Judge
Vince Chhabria
Date
Feb. 14, 2023

Background

Jamie Jweinat and the other plaintiffs sued loanDepot.com, LLC. The opinion states that their claims included a claim under the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and a related claim under California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Ruling

The court granted the motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs conceded that they lacked standing under Article III of the Constitution because they had not identified a concrete injury in fact beyond the bare procedural violation of the Electronic Funds Transfer Act. The court held that, for the same reason, they lacked standing to pursue the related Unfair Competition Law claim. Because the plaintiffs had not suffered an injury in fact, the court did not address the other questions specific to that state-law claim.

The court stated that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction and dismissed the case without prejudice. The order was issued by United States District Judge Vince Chhabria.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.