Pickett v. Saul
- Alex Tse
- 3:20-cv-01772
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Pickett v. Kajakazi, Judge Tse granted $27,352.03 in lawyer fees and ordered counsel to return Pickett’s earlier $6,000 fee award.
Robert Eric Pickett receives the approved fee-related protection, while his attorney, Jerron Harding, may receive $27,352.03 but must refund Pickett the earlier $6,000 Equal Access to Justice Act award.
What happened
Robert Eric Pickett challenged the denial of his Social Security disability benefits. After Pickett sought summary judgment, the parties agreed to send the case back for further proceedings, and the court entered judgment. On remand, Pickett received $133,408.12 in past-due benefits.
Pickett’s lawyer, Jerron Harding, requested $27,352.03 in fees, equal to 20.5% of the past-due benefits, for 33.2 hours of work. The court found the amount reasonable because the fee agreement stayed within the 25% legal limit, the record showed no poor performance or delay, and Pickett obtained a substantial benefits award.
Judge Alex Tse granted the fee request under federal law and ordered Harding to return the $6,000 previously awarded to Pickett under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The detailed version
- Pickett v. Saul · No. 3:20-cv-01772
- Alex Tse
- Feb. 23, 2023
Background
Robert Eric Pickett brought this Social Security case to challenge the Commissioner’s denial of his disability-benefits claim. After Pickett moved for summary judgment, the parties stipulated to a voluntary remand for further proceedings. The court approved that stipulation and entered judgment. It later approved a $6,000 attorney-fee award under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
After the remand, Pickett was awarded $133,408.12 in past-due benefits. His attorney, Jerron Harding, then filed an unopposed motion under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) seeking $27,352.03 in fees based on a contingent-fee agreement and 33.2 hours of work performed in the district-court case.
Reasoning
Section 406(b) governs attorney-fee awards from past-due Social Security benefits. The court found the requested fee reasonable. The fee agreement allowed fees up to 25% of the past-due benefits, matching the statutory cap, while the requested amount represented 20.5% of the award. The record did not show that Harding performed inadequately or delayed the case to increase his fee. The court also considered the substantial benefits award obtained after the Commissioner agreed to remand the case. The requested fee produced an effective hourly rate of approximately $823.85, which the court found reasonable in light of fee awards in similar cases.
Disposition
Judge Alex Tse granted Pickett’s unopposed motion for attorney’s fees under § 406(b) in the amount of $27,352.03. Harding was required to reimburse Pickett for the entire $6,000 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.