Unlockd Media, Inc. Liquidation Trust v. Google LLC
- Haywood Gilliam
- 4:21-cv-07250
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
In Unlockd Media v. Google, Judge Gilliam granted Google’s motion to seal confidential business and financial information cited in its motion to dismiss.
Google LLC and Unlockd Media, Inc. Liquidation Trust; the ruling keeps specified business and financial information under seal.
What happened
In Unlockd Media, Inc. Liquidation Trust v. Google LLC, Google asked the court to seal parts of its motion to dismiss that referred to information the Trust said was nonpublic and protectable as trade secrets.
The court applied the stricter “compelling reasons” standard because the information was connected to a motion that could resolve claims. The information included the Trust’s average monthly revenue per user and projected future revenue.
Judge Gilliam granted the motion to seal, relying on the court’s earlier conclusion that this confidential business and financial information warranted sealing. The sealed documents will remain under seal.
The detailed version
- Unlockd Media, Inc. Liquidation Trust v. Google LLC · No. 4:21-cv-07250
- Haywood Gilliam
- Mar. 21, 2023
Background
Google filed an administrative motion asking the court to decide whether materials belonging to another party should be sealed. The motion concerned discrete portions of Google’s pending motion to dismiss. The Trust argued that those portions contained nonpublic information protected as trade secrets.
Legal standard
The court explained that documents attached to a dispositive motion—one that may resolve claims or the case—are ordinarily subject to a strong presumption of public access. A party seeking to seal such material must show “compelling reasons” supported by specific facts that outweigh the public’s interest in disclosure. The court noted that releasing trade secrets can constitute a compelling reason for sealing. By contrast, documents attached to nondispositive motions generally require only a showing of good cause.
Ruling
The court applied the compelling-reasons standard because the information appeared in a motion to dismiss. Google’s motion referred to dollar amounts from the Trust’s first amended complaint. Those amounts represented the average monthly revenue per user that the Trust had received and its projected future revenue had its business continued. The court stated that it had previously found compelling reasons to seal this confidential business and financial information and granted the motion on the same basis.
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. ordered that the motion to seal be granted. Under the cited local rule, documents filed under seal for which the administrative sealing motion is granted will remain under seal.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.