Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 31, 2023

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.164.24.72

Judge
Susan Illston
Docket
3:23-cv-01124
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Illston granted leave to subpoena Comcast for the subscriber’s identity before the Rule 26(f) conference.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings may seek John Doe’s identity and address from Comcast. Comcast must notify John Doe and preserve the subpoenaed information, while John Doe may challenge the subpoena within the stated period.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC sued John Doe, identified as the subscriber assigned IP address 67.164.24.72, and asked to subpoena Comcast before the parties’ required early case-management meeting.

The court found good cause to allow the subpoena. Strike 3 Holdings may ask Comcast for the defendant’s true name and address, using the information only to protect its rights under the Copyright Act.

Judge Susan Illston granted the application. Comcast must notify John Doe, who may challenge the subpoena within 30 days after service; Strike 3 Holdings must serve the lawsuit documents within 120 days after learning the defendant’s identity.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.164.24.72 · No. 3:23-cv-01124
Judge
Susan Illston
Date
Mar. 31, 2023

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked for permission to serve Comcast Cable, the internet service provider identified in the order, with a subpoena before the parties held the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). The defendant was identified in the caption as John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 67.164.24.72.

Court’s ruling

The court found that Strike 3 Holdings had shown good cause and granted its ex parte application. An ex parte application is a request decided without the opposing party participating beforehand. The order permits Strike 3 Holdings to serve Comcast with a subpoena under Rule 45 seeking the defendant’s true name and address. Strike 3 Holdings must attach the order to the subpoena.

Comcast must serve John Doe with the subpoena and the order within 20 days after Comcast is served. John Doe then has 30 days after service to file a motion challenging the subpoena, including a motion to cancel or modify it. The subpoenaed entity must preserve the requested information while the process continues. Information disclosed in response to the subpoena may be used only to protect Strike 3 Holdings’ rights under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101–1322.

Strike 3 Holdings must serve John Doe with the summons, complaint, and other documents required by the court’s local rules within 120 days after learning John Doe’s identity. If the case continues after service, the parties must discuss whether a protective order is appropriate. The order addresses discovery and service procedures; it does not decide whether John Doe infringed a copyright or whether Strike 3 Holdings will prevail.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.