Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 24, 2023

Andrews v. Warden

Judge
Jon Tigar
Docket
4:23-cv-01445
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
HabeasCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Andrews v. Warden, Judge Barch-Kuchta transferred the habeas case to the Northern District of California because the challenged conviction was entered there.

Who this affects

The transfer affects Richard John Adams Andrews’s federal petition challenging his state conviction and sentence; the case will proceed in the Northern District of California’s San Jose Division.

What happened

In Andrews v. Warden, Richard John Adams Andrews, representing himself, challenged his state conviction and sentence from Santa Clara County in a petition seeking federal review.

The court explained that the case could be heard where Andrews was convicted or imprisoned, but federal courts in California generally handle these petitions in the district where the conviction occurred.

Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta ordered the Clerk to transfer the case to the Northern District of California’s San Jose Division and directed future filings to use the new case number and filing address.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Andrews v. Warden · No. 4:23-cv-01445
Judge
Jon Tigar
Date
Mar. 24, 2023

Background

Richard John Adams Andrews, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition for federal review of his state conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He identified the challenged proceedings as Santa Clara County Superior Court criminal docket numbers C1228874 and/or C1224366.

Transfer decision

The court stated that, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), a federal court may have jurisdiction in the district where the petitioner was convicted or where the petitioner is imprisoned. It also explained that 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) allows a court to transfer a civil action to another district where it could have been filed when doing so serves the convenience of the parties and witnesses and the interests of justice.

Because Santa Clara County is within the Northern District of California, and because federal courts in California generally hear these petitions in the district of conviction, the court found that the petition should be transferred to that district.

Order

Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division. The court also ordered that future filings reference the new case number and be filed with that court.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.