Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 11, 2023

Lynwood Investments CY Limited v. Konovalov

Judge
Maxine Chesney
Docket
3:20-cv-03778
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
27
Fee PetitionIntellectual PropertyCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Lynwood Investments v. Konovalov, Judge Chesney granted in part and denied in part two fee motions, awarding specified amounts to defendants.

Who this affects

Lynwood Investments CY Limited and the defendant F5 Entities and Individual Defendants were affected. The F5 Entities received $804,623.33 in attorneys’ fees, and the Individual Defendants received $583,291.96.

What happened

Lynwood Investments CY Limited sued F5, Inc., related NGINX entities, and several individuals, alleging a conspiracy involving a web-server business and seeking more than $750 million. After the claims were dismissed, the F5 Entities and Individual Defendants asked for attorneys’ fees under the Copyright Act.

The court had already decided that defendants were entitled to fees and addressed only the amounts in this order. It found the non-copyright claims sufficiently related to the copyright claim, approved the requested hourly rates, and reduced some claimed hours because of missing records, block billing, redactions, vague entries, and other billing issues.

Judge Chesney granted in part and denied in part both motions. The F5 Entities received $804,623.33, and the Individual Defendants received $583,291.96; in all other respects, the motions were denied.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lynwood Investments CY Limited v. Konovalov · No. 3:20-cv-03778
Judge
Maxine Chesney
Date
Apr. 11, 2023

Background

Lynwood Investments CY Limited filed the action seeking more than $750 million in damages based on an alleged conspiracy by F5, Inc., NGINX entities, and individual defendants to take a web-server business from Rambler Internet Holding LLC. Lynwood alleged that Rambler had assigned its intellectual-property rights to Lynwood in 2015. The court previously dismissed Lynwood’s complaints.

The F5 Entities—F5, Inc., NGINX., Inc. (BVI), and NGINX Software, Inc.—requested $837,602.15 in attorneys’ fees under section 505 of the Copyright Act. The Individual Defendants—Maxim Konovalov, Igor Sysoev, Andrey Alexeev, Maxim Dounin, Gleb Smirnoff, and Angus Robertson—requested $769,299.10. In an earlier order, the court found that each defendant was entitled to an award, but it needed contemporaneous time records before determining the amount.

Issues and Analysis

Lynwood argued that section 505 did not authorize fees for non-copyright claims and that the requested fees were unreasonable and excessive. The court rejected the first argument. It concluded that the non-copyright claims identified by the defendants shared a common core of facts and related legal theories with Lynwood’s direct copyright-infringement claim. The court therefore allowed defendants to seek fees for work connected to those related claims.

The court used the lodestar method, which calculates fees by multiplying reasonable hours by a reasonable hourly rate. It found the defendants’ requested hourly rates reasonable based on the attorneys’ actual rates, qualifications, experience, the complexity of the case, and the results obtained.

For the F5 Entities, the court found the claimed hours generally reasonable, including time spent on general defense work such as discovery disputes, court-ordered mediation, and case management. It deducted $32,978.82 because the F5 Entities had not provided contemporaneous time records for work performed in April 2021. The resulting award was $804,623.33.

For the Individual Defendants, the court reduced the requested fees for several billing problems. It reduced fees by $25,861.90 for block billing, $36,614.12 for heavily redacted entries, $46,753.62 for vague entries, and $76,777.50 for vaguely described conference-call time. The resulting award was $583,291.96.

Disposition

Judge Chesney ordered that the defendants’ motions for attorneys’ fees were granted in part and denied in part. The F5 Entities were awarded $804,623.33, and the Individual Defendants were awarded $583,291.96. The order states that, in all other respects, the motion was denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 27-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.