Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 21, 2023

Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Communication, Inc.

Judge
Jeffrey White
Docket
4:22-cv-00561
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc., Judge White conditionally granted counsel’s withdrawal motion and required a status report about new counsel.

Who this affects

Cyph, Inc., its withdrawing counsel Leena Mauskar, and Brundige & Stanger, P.C.; the order also affects service of papers in the case until new counsel appears or 30 days pass.

What happened

Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. concerned its lawyer’s request to withdraw from the case. The court vacated the hearing that had been scheduled for May 19, 2023.

Because Cyph is a corporation, it cannot represent itself. The court therefore required the withdrawing lawyer and her law firm to continue receiving papers for 30 days after the order, or until new counsel appeared, whichever happened first. The law firm also had to file a report about finding new counsel by May 15, 2023.

Judge Jeffrey S. White conditionally granted the motion to withdraw and required the status report.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Communication, Inc. · No. 4:22-cv-00561
Judge
Jeffrey White
Date
Apr. 21, 2023

Background

Leena Mauskar, who represented Cyph, Inc., moved for permission to withdraw as Cyph’s counsel. The court vacated the hearing previously scheduled for May 19, 2023.

Court’s reasoning

The court noted that when a lawyer seeks to withdraw without a replacement lawyer appearing at the same time, permission to withdraw may be conditioned on continued service of case papers on the departing lawyer until the client obtains new counsel. The court also stated that, because Cyph is a corporation, it cannot represent itself.

Ruling and requirements

The court conditionally granted the motion to withdraw. It ordered that papers in the case continue to be served on Ms. Mauskar and Brundige & Stanger, P.C. for 30 days from the order’s date or until new counsel filed a notice of appearance, whichever occurred sooner. The court also required Brundige & Stanger, P.C. to file a status report about engaging new counsel for Cyph by May 15, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.