Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 26, 2023

Millennium Franchise Group, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.

Judge
Charles Breyer
Docket
3:21-cv-08684
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Millennium Franchise Group v. Aric K. Perminter, Judge Breyer granted Millennium’s renewed request to serve Aric D. Perminter by publishing the summons.

Who this affects

Millennium Franchise Group, LLC may serve Aric D. Perminter by publishing the summons in a qualifying newspaper near Phillipsburg, New Jersey; the order concerns notice of the lawsuit, not the underlying claims.

What happened

Millennium Franchise Group, LLC sued Aric K. Perminter, Aric D. Perminter, and Lynx Technologies Partners over alleged embezzlement. This order concerns only how Millennium could notify Aric D. Perminter of the lawsuit.

After the court previously rejected Millennium’s request to serve Aric D. by publication, Millennium renewed its request. It described repeated attempts to serve him by mail and in person, requests for his address from his lawyer and father, and extensive internet and records searches.

The court granted the renewed request and ordered publication in a newspaper located in, around, or within a reasonable distance of Phillipsburg, New Jersey. Judge Charles Breyer issued the order, without deciding the underlying embezzlement claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Millennium Franchise Group, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A. · No. 3:21-cv-08684
Judge
Charles Breyer
Date
Apr. 26, 2023

Background

Millennium Franchise Group, LLC brought several claims against Aric K. Perminter, Aric D. Perminter, and Lynx Technologies Partners based on alleged embezzlement. The order addresses Millennium’s renewed request to serve Aric D. Perminter by publication, after the court had previously denied an earlier request.

Reasoning

The court concluded that Millennium had now exercised “reasonable diligence.” The court relied on multiple attempts at mail and personal service, requests for Aric D. Perminter’s address from his attorney and his father, who is also a defendant, and extensive internet and records searches.

The court rejected Millennium’s suggestion that the East Bay Express was the newspaper most likely to provide actual notice. The investigation did not suggest that Aric D. Perminter lived in California. Service had been attempted in New York and Pennsylvania, and his LinkedIn profile listed Phillipsburg, New Jersey, as his city. Under California law, when a person to be served resides or is located outside California, the newspaper most likely to give that person actual notice may also be outside California.

Ruling

The court granted Millennium’s motion for service by publication. It ordered that the summons be published in a named newspaper located in, around, or within a reasonable distance of Phillipsburg, New Jersey, that could publish legal notices in accordance with California Government Code section 6064. The order did not decide the merits of Millennium’s embezzlement-related claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.