Frost v. Obama
- Yvonne Rogers
- 4:20-cv-00605
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Frost v. Obama, Judge Rogers denied Vinton Frost’s motion for a preliminary injunction because he had not pleaded a valid claim.
Vinton Frost’s request for a preliminary injunction was denied. The court also stated that the case was closed and that no further filings would be accepted.
What happened
In Frost v. Obama, Vinton Frost asked the court to issue a preliminary injunction, which is an order meant to provide temporary relief while a case proceeds.
The court denied the motion because an earlier order had found that Frost had not pleaded a valid claim and was unlikely to be able to do so. The court also stated that the case was closed.
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ordered the clerk not to accept further filings and terminated the motion from the docket.
The detailed version
- Frost v. Obama · No. 4:20-cv-00605
- Yvonne Rogers
- July 14, 2023
Background
Vinton Frost moved for a preliminary injunction. The opinion refers to the court’s June 30, 2023 order denying Frost leave to amend his pleading. That earlier order stated that Frost had not pleaded a valid claim and had shown no likelihood of being able to do so.
Ruling
The court explained that it could not grant a preliminary injunction when the plaintiff had not pleaded a valid claim. It therefore denied Frost’s motion for a preliminary injunction.
Case Status
The court stated that the case was closed. It directed the clerk not to accept any further filings in the action and terminated docket number 25. The order was entered without oral argument under the cited court rules.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.