Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 17, 2023

Sheldon v. San Quentin Staff

Judge
Austin
Docket
3:23-cv-03554
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Sheldon v. San Quentin Staff, Magistrate Judge Austin transferred the federal civil-rights case to Northern California because the claim arose in Marin County.

Who this affects

The transfer affects Jeffrey Theodore Sheldon’s case against San Quentin Staff and others by moving it from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California; the order did not decide the claims’ merits.

What happened

In Sheldon v. San Quentin Staff, Jeffrey Theodore Sheldon, a state prisoner representing himself, filed a federal civil-rights case against San Quentin Staff and others under a federal civil-rights law.

The court said the claim arose in Marin County, which is in the Northern District of California. Because the case was filed in the wrong district, the court transferred it to the Northern District of California in the interest of justice.

Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin ordered the transfer. The order did not decide the underlying civil-rights claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sheldon v. San Quentin Staff · No. 3:23-cv-03554
Judge
Austin
Date
July 17, 2023

Background

Jeffrey Theodore Sheldon, a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against San Quentin Staff and others. The opinion states that the claim arose in Marin County.

Venue analysis

The court described the federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). That statute generally permits a civil case to be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. The court concluded that Marin County is in the Northern District of California, so the claim should have been filed there rather than in the Eastern District of California.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district when doing so serves the interest of justice. The court ordered that the matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The opinion did not address the merits of Sheldon’s civil-rights claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.