Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 28, 2023

Guancione v. Lopez

Docket
3:23-cv-01930
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePreliminary Injunction
In one sentence

In Guancione v. Lopez, the court dismissed the action without prejudice after Guancione requested dismissal and the temporary restraining order expired.

Who this affects

Rosalie Guancione’s action against Nicole Lopez was dismissed without prejudice; the order also noted that the temporary restraining order issued by the Santa Clara County Superior Court had expired.

What happened

In Guancione v. Lopez, Rosalie Guancione asked to dismiss the action, and Nicole Lopez did not oppose the request.

The court also noted that a temporary restraining order issued by the Santa Clara County Superior Court had expired.

The court dismissed the action without prejudice. The opinion does not identify Judge [name]; the court entered the order on July 28, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Guancione v. Lopez · No. 3:23-cv-01930
Date
July 28, 2023

Background

Rosalie Guancione requested dismissal of the action. Nicole Lopez did not oppose the request. The order also states that a temporary restraining order entered by the Santa Clara County Superior Court had expired.

Ruling

The court dismissed the action without prejudice. This means the order did not bar a later filing, although the opinion does not discuss any possible later claims or filing.

Judge and disposition

The opinion’s judge name is not legible or otherwise supplied in the text provided. The court entered the dismissal order on July 28, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.