Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.189.204.170
- Jeffrey White
- 4:23-cv-03763
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge White authorized subpoenas to identify the defendant connected to a specified internet address.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, the John Doe defendant associated with IP address 73.189.204.170, Comcast Cable, and any other internet service provider identified through the subpoena process.
What happened
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the court for permission to subpoena Comcast Cable before the parties held their required early case conference. The court found that Strike 3 had shown a sufficient reason to do so.
The order allows subpoenas seeking only the defendant’s true name and address. If another internet provider is identified, Strike 3 may subpoena that provider too. Providers must notify affected subscribers, and subscribers and providers have 30 days to challenge a subpoena before information may be produced.
The court also required providers to preserve the requested information, limited its use to protecting Strike 3’s copyright rights, and required filings containing identifying information to be sealed. Judge Jeffrey White issued the order on August 17, 2023.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.189.204.170 · No. 4:23-cv-03763
- Jeffrey White
- Aug. 17, 2023
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed an ex parte motion—meaning a motion considered without advance participation by the opposing party—for permission to serve a subpoena before the parties’ Rule 26(f) conference. The requested subpoena was directed to Comcast Cable, identified as the initial internet service provider, and sought information about the defendant associated with IP address 73.189.204.170.
Ruling
The court found that Strike 3 had established good cause to serve the subpoena. The order authorizes Strike 3 to serve Comcast Cable with a subpoena under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 seeking only the defendant’s true name and address. A copy of the order must accompany the subpoena.
The order also permits Strike 3 to serve the same type of subpoena on any other internet service provider identified in response to a subpoena as providing internet services to the defendant. The order treats the authorized subpoenas as court orders permitting disclosure under 47 U.S.C. § 551, provided the subscriber receives notice.
Protections and deadlines
Each internet service provider has 30 days after service to give each affected subscriber a copy of the subpoena and this order. Each subscriber and provider then has 30 days after service to file a motion challenging the subpoena, including a motion to cancel or modify it. If no timely challenge is filed, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information.
Providers must preserve the subpoenaed information until they provide it to Strike 3 or the court finally resolves a timely challenge. Strike 3 may use information produced under the subpoenas only to protect its rights under the Copyright Act. Documents containing the name or other identifying information of a current or proposed defendant must be filed under seal, following the court’s local sealing procedure. Judge Jeffrey White dated and issued the order on August 17, 2023.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.