Garrison v. Biden
- Jacquelyn Corley
- 3:23-cv-01623
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Garrison v. Biden, Judge Corley struck unsigned plaintiffs from the complaint and granted Garrison’s dismissal request, closing the case without prejudice.
Steve Garrison, the other people listed as plaintiffs, and the defendants. The other listed plaintiffs were removed from the complaint, and Garrison’s case was dismissed without prejudice and closed.
What happened
Garrison v. Biden was brought by Steve Garrison, a California prisoner without a lawyer, against President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, the “NFL Commission,” and the “NBA Commission.” Garrison also listed professional athletes, musicians, and actors as additional plaintiffs, but they did not sign the complaint or indicate that they wanted to participate. Because Garrison was not a lawyer, he could not represent them or act as a class representative.
Before the defendants were served, Garrison asked to voluntarily dismiss the case. He also requested attorney’s fees. The court said he was not entitled to fees because he was not a party who had prevailed in the case.
Judge Jacquelyn Corley struck the complaint in part, removing all listed plaintiffs other than Steve Garrison because they had not signed it. The court granted the motion for voluntary dismissal and dismissed the case without prejudice. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment and close the file.
The detailed version
- Garrison v. Biden · No. 3:23-cv-01623
- Jacquelyn Corley
- Aug. 22, 2023
Background
Steve Garrison, identified in the opinion as a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, filed a civil-rights action against President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, the “NFL Commission,” and the “NBA Commission.” The complaint also listed a number of current and former professional athletes, musicians, and actors as additional plaintiffs.
Those additional plaintiffs did not sign the complaint as required by Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The court also explained that Garrison could not represent them because he was not an attorney, and that he could not serve as a class representative in a class action. The court therefore struck the complaint to the extent it listed plaintiffs who had not signed it—meaning all plaintiffs other than Steve Garrison.
Voluntary dismissal and attorney’s fees
The defendants had not been served. Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The court stated that this right leaves no role for the court to play in deciding the merits and that Garrison therefore had the right to dismiss the case.
Garrison also stated that he wanted attorney’s fees, identifying rates or amounts that the opinion recounts. The court rejected that request, explaining that attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1988 are available to a prevailing party in a case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and that Garrison was not a prevailing party.
Disposition
The court struck the complaint in part as to the unsigned additional plaintiffs. It granted the motion for voluntary dismissal and dismissed the case without prejudice. The Clerk was ordered to enter judgment and close the file. The order disposed of docket number 8.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.