Walker v. Marin County Sheriff's Department
- James Donato
- 3:23-cv-04428
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Walker v. Marin County Sheriff's Department, Judge Donato temporarily barred removal of The Chandalar and set a preliminary-injunction hearing.
Logan Paul Walker and the defendants, including the Marin County Sheriff's Department, were affected. The defendants were temporarily barred from removing, seizing, or destroying The Chandalar, subject to the public-safety exception.
What happened
In Walker v. Marin County Sheriff's Department, pro se plaintiff Logan Paul Walker said he was trying to salvage his 33-foot sailboat, The Chandalar, after it ran aground near Stinson Beach. The Marin County Sheriff's Department indicated that it planned to remove and dispose of the vessel.
The court issued a temporary restraining order without notice, briefly preserving the situation until the defendants could respond. It barred the defendants from removing, seizing, or destroying The Chandalar, except when necessary to address a specific and imminent public-health or safety threat. The court ordered a response by September 5, 2023, and set a preliminary-injunction hearing for September 7, 2023.
Judge James Donato issued the order on August 29, 2023. The order did not decide whether Walker would ultimately receive a preliminary injunction.
The detailed version
- Walker v. Marin County Sheriff's Department · No. 3:23-cv-04428
- James Donato
- Aug. 29, 2023
Background
Pro se plaintiff Logan Paul Walker stated that he was the captain of The Chandalar, a 33-foot sailboat. The boat ran aground near Stinson Beach in Marin County, California, on July 31, 2023, while Walker had it sailing on autopilot. The Marin County Sheriff's Department indicated that it intended to remove and dispose of the vessel on August 31, 2023. Walker said he was actively trying to salvage it and requested a temporary restraining order, which is a short-term court order intended to preserve the situation while the court considers further relief.
The court expressed doubt that delaying removal was warranted. It noted that the vessel was sizable and near a popular recreational beach, that Walker had already had almost a month to salvage it, that he acknowledged being short on funds, and that the record did not identify a specific salvage deadline or plan. The court also noted that Walker waited until the last minute to seek court intervention even though he had known since August 18, 2023, that the sheriff intended to act.
Ruling
Even so, the court determined that a brief delay was appropriate to preserve the status quo until the defendants could appear and respond. The court therefore issued the temporary restraining order without notice. Pending further order, the defendants and persons acting with them were restrained from removing The Chandalar from its present location or seizing or destroying it.
The order did not prohibit removal, seizure, or destruction if necessary to prevent a specific and imminent threat to public health or safety. The defendants were directed to respond to Walker's request for a preliminary injunction by 12:00 p.m. on September 5, 2023. The court set an in-person preliminary-injunction hearing for September 7, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 11 in San Francisco. The order also directed immediate service of the case materials and order on the defendants.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.