Oliver v. EHM Productions, Inc.
- Vince Chhabria
- 3:23-cv-02671
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Oliver v. EHM Productions, Inc., Judge Chhabria dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice because it was frivolous and failed to state a claim.
Anthony Oliver, EHM Productions, Inc., and the other defendants named in the case; the order also affected all pending motions.
What happened
In Oliver v. EHM Productions, Inc., the court considered Anthony Oliver’s amended complaint against EHM Productions, Inc., and other defendants.
The opinion does not describe the factual allegations or the specific claims in the amended complaint. It states only that the complaint was frivolous and failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted.
Judge Vince Chhabria dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice because any further amendment would be futile. The court also dismissed all pending motions as moot and said it would not consider further requests or motions from Oliver in the case.
The detailed version
- Oliver v. EHM Productions, Inc. · No. 3:23-cv-02671
- Vince Chhabria
- Sept. 15, 2023
Background
The opinion concerns Anthony Oliver’s amended complaint against EHM Productions, Inc., and other defendants. It does not provide the complaint’s factual allegations or identify the specific causes of action.
Ruling
The court dismissed the amended complaint because it was frivolous and failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted. The court ruled that dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the complaint could not be refiled in the case, because any further amendment would be futile.
Other Dispositions
The court also dismissed all pending motions as moot. It stated that no further requests or motions from Oliver would be considered in the case. Judge Vince Chhabria signed the order on September 15, 2023.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.