Kimberly M. v. Saul
- Donna Ryu
- 4:19-cv-06585-DMR
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 4
In Kimberly M. v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Judge Ryu granted counsel’s fee motion, awarding $25,579.98 and requiring return of an earlier Equal Access to Justice Act payment.
Kimberly M. and her attorney, Joshua B. Kons; the order authorizes payment of the awarded fee from withheld past-due benefits and requires Kons to refund Kimberly M. $6,752.69.
What happened
In Kimberly M. v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Kimberly M. challenged the Social Security Administration’s denial of her disability benefits. The court previously granted her request for summary judgment and sent the case back for further proceedings; an administrative law judge then found her disabled and awarded past-due benefits.
Her attorney, Joshua B. Kons, asked for $25,579.98 under the Social Security Act. The amount was 18.39% of Kimberly M.’s $139,119.90 award and was within the 25% limit in their fee agreement. No party objected, and the court found the request reasonable.
Judge Donna M. Ryu granted the fee motion. The court awarded $25,579.98, less any required administrative assessment, and ordered Kons to return $6,752.69 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The detailed version
- Kimberly M. v. Saul · No. 4:19-cv-06585-DMR
- Donna Ryu
- Oct. 10, 2023
Background
Kimberly M. applied for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. After an administrative law judge found her not disabled and the Appeals Council denied review, she appealed to the district court. On March 3, 2021, the court granted her motion for summary judgment and remanded the case for further administrative proceedings. On remand, an administrative law judge found Kimberly M. disabled, and the Social Security Administration awarded her $139,119.90 in past-due disability benefits.
Fee request and analysis
Kimberly M.’s attorney, Joshua B. Kons, moved for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Their retainer agreement allowed him to seek up to 25% of any past-due benefits. Kons requested $25,579.98, equal to 18.39% of the past-due benefits. He reported spending 30.87 hours litigating the case in federal court. No party objected.
The court explained that § 406(b) permits a successful attorney to receive up to 25% of past-due benefits, subject to court review for reasonableness. The court considered the fee agreement, the time spent, the results achieved, whether the representation was adequate, and whether the requested amount was an improper windfall. It found that the request did not exceed the statutory limit, the hours appeared reasonable, and the record did not show substandard representation. The court also explained that the requested fee produced an effective hourly rate of $828.64 and that a standard hourly-fee calculation does not control this type of contingent-fee award.
Ruling
Judge Donna M. Ryu granted the motion for attorneys’ fees. The court awarded $25,579.98, less any administrative assessment required under 42 U.S.C. § 406(d). Because Kons had previously received $6,752.69 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, he was ordered to refund that amount to Kimberly M. The Commissioner was permitted to send any payment of withheld past-due benefits to the registered address of Kimberly M.’s attorney.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.