Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 23, 2024

Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:21-cv-02556
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Maslic v. ISM Vuzem, Judge Freeman ordered Eisenmann to explain why its answer should not be stricken and default entered.

Who this affects

Defendant Eisenmann Corporation, whose answer could be stricken and against which default could be entered if it does not provide the required explanation; its former counsel also had service and filing obligations.

What happened

In Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o., the attorneys representing Defendant Eisenmann Corporation withdrew with the court’s permission.

The court stated that a corporation may be represented only by a licensed attorney. It therefore required Eisenmann to explain in writing, within 30 days, why its answer should not be stricken and default entered against it. Eisenmann’s former attorneys also had to provide the order to the company and file proof that they had done so.

Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued an order to show cause; she did not state that Eisenmann’s answer had been stricken or that default had been entered.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. · No. 5:21-cv-02556
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
Jan. 23, 2024

Background

All counsel of record for Defendant Eisenmann Corporation had withdrawn from representing the company with the court’s permission. The opinion cites the rule that a corporation can be represented only by a licensed attorney.

Order

The court ordered Eisenmann to show cause—that is, to explain in writing—within 30 days why its answer should not be stricken and default entered against it. The order did not itself strike the answer or enter default.

The company’s former counsel, Frost Brown Todd LLC and Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, were required to provide Eisenmann with a copy of the order and file proof of service showing that they had done so.

Disposition and Effect

Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued an order to show cause. The opinion does not report a final ruling striking Eisenmann’s answer or entering default.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.