Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2024

Seth v. 22 Enterprises Inc.

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:22-cv-07542
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

Seth v. 22 Enterprises, Judge Cousins dismissed the settled action with prejudice, administratively closed it, and retained jurisdiction for 45 days.

Who this affects

Raj Seth and the defendants, including 22 Enterprises, Inc., were affected by the dismissal of the action and all asserted claims with prejudice. The case was administratively closed, and any party could move to reopen it within 45 days.

What happened

In Seth v. 22 Enterprises Inc., the court was notified that the parties had settled the action and that no issue remained for the court to decide.

The court dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice, directed the clerk to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and allowed any party to seek reopening within 45 days.

Judge Nathanael M. Cousins issued the order and retained jurisdiction over the case for 45 days.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Seth v. 22 Enterprises Inc. · No. 5:22-cv-07542
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Mar. 8, 2024

Background

The court stated that it had been notified of the settlement of the action and that no issue remained for the court’s determination. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court ordered that the action and all claims asserted in it be dismissed with prejudice. It directed the clerk to administratively close the case, vacated all scheduled dates, and stated that any party could move to reopen the case if the motion was filed within 45 days.

Jurisdiction

The court retained jurisdiction over the case for 45 days. The order was signed by United States Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.