Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 8, 2024

Center For Biological Diversity v. Raimondo

Judge
Martinez-Olguin
Docket
3:23-cv-06642
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEnvironmental
In one sentence

Center For Biological Diversity v. Raimondo: Judge Martinez-Olguin denied defendants’ request to extend the statutory deadline for filing the administrative record.

Who this affects

The ruling directly affected defendants Gina Raimondo and the National Marine Fisheries Service by requiring them to proceed toward filing the administrative record for the Magnuson-Stevens claim, and it required the plaintiffs and defendants to submit a joint proposed schedule within five days.

What happened

In Center For Biological Diversity v. Raimondo, the plaintiffs brought two Endangered Species Act claims and one Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act claim against Gina Raimondo and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Defendants asked for more time to file the administrative record for the fishery-law claim until after the court ruled on their planned motion to dismiss the Endangered Species Act claims.

The court rejected defendants’ argument that their dismissal motion paused the deadline. It explained that the 45-day deadline came from a statute, and the federal rule allowing extensions generally does not extend statutory deadlines. The court also found that defendants had not shown good cause based on staff workload or the alleged lack of detail in the Endangered Species Act claims.

Judge Martinez-Olguin denied the motion to extend the time to file the administrative record for the Magnuson-Stevens claim. The parties were ordered to submit a joint proposed schedule within five days for filing that record.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Center For Biological Diversity v. Raimondo · No. 3:23-cv-06642
Judge
Martinez-Olguin
Date
Mar. 8, 2024

Background

Center for Biological Diversity and Turtle Island Restoration Network sued Gina Raimondo and the National Marine Fisheries Service over three claims: two under the Endangered Species Act and one under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. The defendants filed a motion asking for an extension of time to lodge, or file, the administrative record for the Magnuson-Stevens claim. They sought a deadline of 14 days after the court ruled on their forthcoming motion to dismiss the two Endangered Species Act claims for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

The Magnuson-Stevens Act gives defendants 45 days to respond to the complaint and file the administrative record for the challenged regulation. Defendants argued that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), together with the local rules, allowed the court to extend that deadline because their motion to dismiss paused the time for responding to the claims.

Court’s Analysis

The court rejected that argument. Although defendants cited Ninth Circuit decisions stating that a partial motion to dismiss can pause a defendant’s response deadline for all claims, the court noted that those decisions did not involve claims with a statutory response deadline. The court explained that Rule 6(b) governs deadlines established by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or by a court order, not deadlines established by statute.

The court also rejected defendants’ request for an extension based on good cause. Defendants cited the National Marine Fisheries Service’s limited staff and competing priorities, but the court found that they had not shown that other employees were unavailable or unable to prepare the record. The court also found that the alleged lack of detail in the plaintiffs’ Endangered Species Act claims did not justify delaying the administrative record for the separate Magnuson-Stevens claim. The defendants acknowledged that this record was closed and concerned a decision dated December 1, 2023.

Ruling

The court denied defendants’ motion to extend the time to lodge the administrative record for the plaintiffs’ Magnuson-Stevens claim. It ordered the parties to submit, within five days, a joint proposed schedule for defendants to file that record. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin did not rule in this order on the pending motion to dismiss the Endangered Species Act claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.