Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.203.252.212
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.203.252.212
- Jon Tigar
- 4:24-cv-01023
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 3
In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Tigar allowed early subpoenas to identify an internet subscriber in a copyright case, with privacy protections.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC may seek the identity and address of the subscriber assigned the listed IP address. The subscriber and any other affected subscribers or internet service providers may receive notice and challenge the subpoenas, and identifying information must remain confidential under the order’s terms.
What happened
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked the court for permission to serve a subpoena on AT&T Inc. before the parties’ required early-case conference. The subpoena seeks the name and address of the John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.203.252.212, in connection with claims described in Strike 3’s complaint.
Judge Tigar’s order allows Strike 3 to subpoena AT&T and, if necessary, another identified internet service provider. The providers must notify affected subscribers, who may challenge the subpoena or seek to change it within 30 days. If no challenge is filed, the provider may produce the requested information after the required waiting period.
In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 107.203.252.212, Judge Jon S. Tigar granted Strike 3’s application and issued a limited protective order. Information identifying a current or proposed defendant must remain confidential until the person has an opportunity to ask to proceed anonymously and the court rules on that request. The order did not decide whether anyone infringed Strike 3’s copyright.
The detailed version
- Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.203.252.212 · No. 4:24-cv-01023
- Jon Tigar
- Mar. 15, 2024
Background
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC applied without advance notice to the opposing party for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the required Rule 26(f) conference. The application concerned a defendant identified in the caption as John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.203.252.212. The opinion states that Strike 3’s complaint sets out its rights and claims, but this order did not decide the merits of those claims.
Ruling on Early Discovery
The court found that Strike 3 had shown “good cause” under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 to obtain early discovery. It authorized Strike 3 to serve AT&T Inc., identified as the internet service provider, with a subpoena seeking the true name and address of the defendant to whom the provider assigned the IP address listed in the complaint and caption. Strike 3 must attach the order to the subpoena.
The court also authorized Strike 3 to serve the same type of subpoena on any service provider identified in response as providing internet services to the defendant.
Notice and Challenges
If the provider qualifies as a cable operator under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), it must comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2), including notifying the subscriber by sending a copy of the order. More generally, each internet service provider has 30 days after service to notify each subscriber whose identity is sought by providing a copy of the subpoena and the order. Notice may be sent by reasonable means, including first-class mail or overnight service to the subscriber’s last known address.
Each subscriber and each provider has 30 days after service on that person or entity to file a motion contesting, quashing, or modifying the subpoena. If that period expires without a challenge, the provider has 10 days to produce the responsive information to Strike 3.
Confidentiality and Disposition
The court issued a limited protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Any name or other identifying information released to Strike 3 must be treated as confidential and may not be publicly disclosed until the defendant has had an opportunity to ask to proceed anonymously and the court has ruled on that request. If the defendant does not seek permission to proceed anonymously within 30 days after the information is disclosed to Strike 3, the protective order expires.
In Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 107.203.252.212, Judge Jon S. Tigar granted the ex parte application for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the Rule 26(f) conference and entered the limited protective order. The order is a discovery ruling; it does not determine whether the defendant infringed Strike 3’s copyright.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.