Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 19, 2024

Jefferson v. Beam

Judge
Peterson
Docket
5:24-cv-01790
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Civil RightsPro Se
In one sentence

In Jefferson v. Beam, Judge Peterson transferred the prisoner’s civil-rights action to the Northern District of California because the claim arose there.

Who this affects

Tyrece Jefferson’s Section 1983 civil-rights action was transferred from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California; the opinion does not state the effect on his filing-fee application.

What happened

In Jefferson v. Beam, Tyrece Jefferson, a state prisoner representing himself, filed a civil-rights lawsuit under a federal law known as Section 1983 against Erik Beam. Jefferson also applied to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court explained that federal venue rules generally allow a case to be filed where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events occurred. The court found that Jefferson’s claim arose in Monterey County, which is in the Northern District of California, so the action was filed in the wrong district.

The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the interest of justice. Judge Jeremy D. Peterson issued the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jefferson v. Beam · No. 5:24-cv-01790
Judge
Peterson
Date
Mar. 19, 2024

Background

Tyrece Jefferson, a state prisoner representing himself, filed a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Erik Beam. Jefferson also filed an application to proceed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Venue

Venue is the federal district where a case may properly be filed. The court quoted 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), which identifies several possible venues, including a district where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred. The court determined that Jefferson’s claim arose in Monterey County, which is located in the Northern District of California. It therefore concluded that the action should have been filed there rather than in the Eastern District of California.

Ruling

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district in the interest of justice. The court ordered that the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The opinion does not state how the court ruled on Jefferson’s application to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.