Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 27, 2024

Watts v. County of Colusa

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:24-cv-01789
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSection 1983Pro Se
In one sentence

In Watts v. County of Colusa, Judge Cousins transferred the civil-rights case to the Eastern District of California because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Quinton Watts's civil-rights case was moved from the Northern District of California to the Eastern District of California; the opinion did not decide the underlying claims.

What happened

In Watts v. County of Colusa, Quinton Watts, a former prisoner representing himself, sued Colusa County under a federal civil-rights law. He sought damages for alleged rights violations during criminal proceedings in Colusa County.

The court said the events occurred in Colusa County, which is in the Eastern District of California. It therefore concluded that the case belonged in that district rather than the Northern District of California.

Judge Nathanael M. Cousins transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire case file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Watts v. County of Colusa · No. 5:24-cv-01789
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Mar. 27, 2024

Background

Quinton Watts, identified as a former prisoner, filed a civil-rights complaint without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County of Colusa. The complaint sought damages for alleged violations of his rights during criminal proceedings in Colusa County.

Venue Analysis

The court determined that the complained-of acts occurred in Colusa County. Because Colusa County lies within the Eastern District of California, the court concluded that venue—the proper federal district for the case—was in the Eastern District rather than the Northern District of California. The court also stated that, if Watts were to file a petition challenging his state conviction, the traditional venue would likewise be the district of conviction or sentencing, which is Colusa County.

Disposition

The court transferred the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). The clerk was ordered to terminate all pending motions and transfer the entire file. Judge Nathanael M. Cousins signed the order. The opinion did not decide the merits of Watts's civil-rights allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.