Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 24, 2024

Davis v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Docket
4:19-cv-05866
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureSummary Judgment
In one sentence

Davis v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals: Judge Gilliam denied Davis’s request to reopen the closed case after summary judgment and appellate affirmance.

Who this affects

Gloria Jeanette Davis’s request to reopen her closed case was denied; Kaiser Foundation Hospitals remains the prevailing defendant under the earlier judgment.

What happened

In Davis v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Gloria Jeanette Davis asked the court to reopen her case and requested a trial or oral argument. The court treated her filings as a request to set aside the judgment under Rule 60(b).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Davis v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · No. 4:19-cv-05866
Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Date
Apr. 24, 2024

Background

On February 2, 2022, the court granted summary judgment for Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and entered judgment against Gloria Jeanette Davis. The Ninth Circuit affirmed that ruling on August 17, 2023. Davis later filed documents asking the court to reopen the case and requesting a trial or oral argument.

Rule 60(b) request

The court treated Davis’s filings as a motion to vacate, or set aside, the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). That rule permits relief from a final judgment in limited circumstances, including mistake or excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud by the opposing party, a void judgment, satisfaction of the judgment, or another reason that justifies relief.

The court concluded that Davis’s filings did not satisfy any of those grounds. It said she essentially disagreed with the court’s summary-judgment decision but had not shown mistake, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, fraud, that the judgment was void, or that the judgment had been satisfied. The court also noted that the Ninth Circuit had considered and affirmed the summary-judgment ruling.

Ruling

Judge HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. denied Davis’s request to reopen the action. The court stated that the case remains closed and directed the Clerk not to accept further filings in it. The court also stated that any additional materials sent by mail would be returned without review.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.