Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 29, 2024

Duckett v. Garcia

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:24-cv-00536
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Duckett v. Garcia, Judge Freeman dismissed the prisoner’s duplicative civil-rights lawsuit and closed the case.

Who this affects

James Maurice Duckett’s duplicative § 1983 action against Correctional Officer P. Garcia was dismissed, and the case was closed.

What happened

In Duckett v. Garcia, James Maurice Duckett, a state prisoner representing himself, sued Correctional Officer P. Garcia under a federal civil-rights law over events at Salinas Valley State Prison. He also asked to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court found that Duckett had already filed an earlier case against the same defendant based on the same allegations and seeking damages. That earlier case had been served on Garcia and was still pending briefing. The two cases concerned the same alleged cross-gender body search on January 9, 2020.

Judge Beth Labson Freeman dismissed the complaint as duplicative. The Clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and close the file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Duckett v. Garcia · No. 5:24-cv-00536
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
Apr. 29, 2024

Background

James Maurice Duckett, a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, brought a civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Correctional Officer P. Garcia. The action concerned events at Salinas Valley State Prison, specifically an alleged cross-gender body search by Garcia on January 9, 2020. Duckett sought damages and moved for permission to proceed without paying the filing fee.

Duckett had previously filed an action in the same district against Garcia involving the same allegations. The earlier action, identified in the opinion as Case No. 23-cv-04748 BLF, had been served on Garcia and was pending briefing when this action was filed.

Court’s Analysis

The court explained that duplicative or repetitious litigation involving virtually identical claims may be treated as abusive and dismissed under the statute governing complaints filed without paying the filing fee, 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A lawsuit is duplicative when it repeats the same factual allegations and arises from the same core set of events as an earlier case. The court determined that this action and Duckett’s earlier action arose from the same core facts and involved the same defendant and allegations.

Disposition

The complaint was dismissed as duplicative. The Clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and close the file. The opinion does not add a “with prejudice” or “without prejudice” designation.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.