Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 9, 2024

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.202.134.10

Judge
Cisneros
Docket
3:24-cv-01800
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureDiscovery
In one sentence

In Strike 3 Holdings v. John Doe, Judge Cisneros authorized subpoenas seeking the subscriber’s identity and imposed notice, confidentiality, and challenge procedures.

Who this affects

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, the John Doe subscriber associated with IP address 71.202.134.10, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, and any other internet-service provider identified in response to a subpoena.

What happened

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC asked in Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber Assigned IP Address 71.202.134.10 for permission to subpoena Comcast before the parties’ required initial conference. The court found good cause for the request.

The order allows Strike 3 to subpoena Comcast for the defendant’s true name and address and to subpoena another internet provider identified in Comcast’s response. The provider must notify the subscriber, and the subscriber or provider may challenge the subpoena within 30 days.

Judge Cisneros ordered the provider to preserve the information and limited Strike 3’s use of it to enforcing the rights described in its complaint. The defendant’s identifying information must be filed under seal, and the order does not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 71.202.134.10 · No. 3:24-cv-01800
Judge
Cisneros
Date
May 9, 2024

Background

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC filed an ex parte application—an application made without a prior hearing involving the opposing party—for permission to serve a third-party subpoena before the parties held the conference required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f). Strike 3 sought to subpoena Comcast Cable Communications, LLC for the true name and address of the defendant associated with the internet protocol address listed in the complaint.

Order

The court found that Strike 3 had shown good cause to serve the subpoena. The order authorizes Strike 3 to serve Comcast with a Rule 45 subpoena seeking the defendant’s true name and address. Strike 3 must attach a copy of the order to the subpoena. If Comcast’s response identifies another internet-service provider for the defendant, Strike 3 may serve that provider with a subpoena in the same manner.

If the provider qualifies as a cable operator under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), the order requires it to comply with 47 U.S.C. § 551(c)(2)(B), which permits disclosure of personal identifying information under a court order when the subscriber is notified. The provider must serve the subscriber with copies of the subpoena and this order within 30 days after the subpoena is served.

Subscriber protections and confidentiality

Each subscriber and provider has 30 days after service to file a motion contesting the subpoena, including a motion to quash or modify it. If no subscriber challenges the subpoena during that period, the provider has 10 additional days to produce the responsive information for that subscriber. The provider must preserve the subpoenaed information until it produces the information or until any timely motion to quash is finally resolved.

Strike 3 may use information disclosed in response to the subpoena only to protect and enforce the rights described in its complaint. The defendant’s name and other identifying information must be filed provisionally under seal and may not otherwise be disclosed. After service on the defendant, the court may require the defendant to request permission to proceed anonymously.

Disposition

The order allows the requested third-party subpoena process and sets procedures for notice, challenges, preservation, and confidentiality. It does not decide the underlying claims against the defendant. The order was signed by Lisa J. Cisneros, United States Magistrate Judge.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.