Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 29, 2024

Harrington v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Docket
4:23-cv-06296
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureDiscoveryMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Harrington v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Judge Gilliam granted the FDIC’s motion to stay discovery while its potentially case-dispositive motion to dismiss remains pending.

Who this affects

The order pauses discovery for the plaintiffs and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation while the defendant’s motion to dismiss is pending.

What happened

In Harrington v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the defendant asked the court to pause discovery while its previously filed motion to dismiss was pending.

The court found good cause for the pause because the motion to dismiss could potentially resolve the entire case on jurisdictional grounds and could be decided without discovery. The court also noted that no case schedule had been set, so the pause was not expected to unfairly harm the plaintiffs.

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted the defendant’s motion and ordered discovery stayed until the court resolves the motion to dismiss.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Harrington v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation · No. 4:23-cv-06296
Judge
Haywood Gilliam
Date
May 29, 2024

Background

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to stay, or temporarily pause, discovery while its previously filed motion to dismiss was pending.

Court’s reasoning

The court found good cause for a discovery stay because the motion to dismiss was potentially dispositive of the entire case on jurisdictional grounds and could be decided without discovery. The court also noted that it had not yet established a case schedule, so temporarily pausing discovery would not unduly prejudice the plaintiffs.

Ruling

Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. granted the defendant’s motion to stay discovery. The court ordered discovery stayed pending resolution of the defendant’s motion to dismiss. The opinion did not decide the motion to dismiss itself.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.